VICE vs. BETZ
VICE (AdvisorShares Vice ETF) and BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. VICE is actively managed, while BETZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VICE returned 1.67%/yr vs -5.84%/yr for BETZ. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VICE charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BETZ.
Performance
VICE vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VICE achieves a 4.78% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's -8.87% return.
VICE
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- -4.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.50%
BETZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- -8.87%
- 1Y
- -16.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- -5.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $205.48K | $310.34K | $782.30K | |
| $15.61K | $15.90K | $15.22K |
VICE vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 4.78% | 1.56% | 18.27% | 3.01% | -18.28% | 8.50% | 29.53% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -8.87% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -42.02% | -3.91% | 65.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VICE and BETZ is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VICE and BETZ has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VICE vs. BETZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VICE
BETZ
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
VICE
BETZ
Consumer Defensive
VICE
BETZ
-
Communication Services
VICE
BETZ
Real Estate
VICE
BETZ
-
Basic Materials
VICE
BETZ
-
Technology
VICE
BETZ
Energy
VICE
-
BETZ
-
Financial Services
VICE
-
BETZ
Healthcare
VICE
-
BETZ
-
Industrials
VICE
-
BETZ
Utilities
VICE
-
BETZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VICE vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank
VICE
BETZ
VICE vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VICE | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.88 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.60 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | -0.93 | +0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VICE vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VICE drawdown since its inception was -38.27%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICE and BETZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VICE | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.27% | -60.82% | +22.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -29.20% | +15.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | -29.20% | +12.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.92% | -59.79% | +29.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.11% | -38.35% | +31.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -33.89% | +21.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.17% | 18.92% | -10.75% |
Volatility
VICE vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) is 4.42%, while Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that VICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VICE | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 5.96% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 17.04% | -6.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.83% | 21.17% | -7.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 26.97% | -9.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 27.85% | -8.73% |
VICE vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VICE has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
VICE vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison
VICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than BETZ's 5.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.02% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 0.75% | 0.79% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 2.47% | 1.72% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VICE and BETZ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BETZ has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to VICE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICE dropped -38.27% vs BETZ's -60.82%.
On 5-year performance, VICE leads with 1.67% vs -5.84% for BETZ. On fees, BETZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, VICE has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VICE has performed better with a 1.67% return vs -5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BETZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for VICE.
BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 0.75% for VICE.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for VICE and 0.75% for BETZ.
VICE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VICE and BETZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer