PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VICE vs. BETZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VICE vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VICE vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VICE
AdvisorShares Vice ETF
-0.08%1.56%18.27%3.01%-18.28%8.50%29.64%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
-14.85%15.75%10.22%21.17%-42.02%-3.91%60.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VICE achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's -14.85% return.


VICE

1D
1.83%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
-10.54%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
5.53%
5Y*
-0.79%
10Y*

BETZ

1D
3.13%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-14.85%
6M
-21.76%
1Y
-0.63%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
-9.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VICE vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VICE has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VICE vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VICE
VICE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BETZ
BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VICE vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VICEBETZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.10

-0.03

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.24

0.13

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.02

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

-0.07

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.20

-0.14

+0.35

VICE vs. BETZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VICE Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the BETZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VICE and BETZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VICEBETZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

-0.03

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

-0.36

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.10

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between VICE and BETZ is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VICE vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison

VICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than BETZ's 5.37% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VICE
AdvisorShares Vice ETF
0.79%0.79%1.46%1.69%0.96%0.99%0.00%2.47%1.72%0.17%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
5.37%4.57%0.86%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VICE vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VICE drawdown since its inception was -38.27%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICE and BETZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VICEBETZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.27%

-60.82%

+22.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.59%

-29.20%

+15.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-60.82%

+25.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.42%

-42.39%

+30.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.46%

-33.64%

+21.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

14.06%

-7.06%

Volatility

VICE vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) is 4.53%, while Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that VICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VICEBETZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

8.08%

-3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

15.98%

-6.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.98%

23.02%

-8.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

27.27%

-9.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

28.13%

-8.84%