VHYG.L vs. IGF
VHYG.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VHYG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VHYG.L returned 11.55%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for IGF. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHYG.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.
Performance
VHYG.L vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VHYG.L is traded in GBP, while IGF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGF values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHYG.L achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 9.54% return.
VHYG.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 11.13%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- 1Y
- 26.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- —
IGF
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
VHYG.L vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHYG.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF | 11.13% | 18.36% | 10.98% | 5.02% | 6.20% | 19.28% | -3.61% | -18.20% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.54% | 12.66% | 16.82% | 0.84% | 10.49% | 12.63% | -9.24% | -1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHYG.L and IGF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019 | 0.51 |
The correlation between VHYG.L and IGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
VHYG.L vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHYG.L
IGF
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
VHYG.L
IGF
-
Industrials
VHYG.L
IGF
Healthcare
VHYG.L
IGF
-
Energy
VHYG.L
IGF
Consumer Defensive
VHYG.L
IGF
-
Technology
VHYG.L
IGF
-
Consumer Cyclical
VHYG.L
IGF
-
Utilities
VHYG.L
IGF
Basic Materials
VHYG.L
IGF
-
Communication Services
VHYG.L
IGF
-
Real Estate
VHYG.L
IGF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHYG.L vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
VHYG.L
IGF
VHYG.L vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VHYG.L | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.32 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 3.50 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.66 | 8.94 | +4.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VHYG.L vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHYG.L drawdown since its inception was -39.80%, roughly equal to the maximum IGF drawdown of -40.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYG.L and IGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHYG.L | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.80% | -40.37% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -5.10% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.90% | -11.18% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.90% | -17.01% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -3.07% | +2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.84% | -7.57% | -2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 1.99% | -0.06% |
Volatility
VHYG.L vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L) is 2.00%, while iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that VHYG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHYG.L | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 3.33% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | 7.73% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.17% | 9.55% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 12.11% | +5.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 15.98% | +3.77% |
VHYG.L vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHYG.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VHYG.L vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
VHYG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.96% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
VHYG.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHYG.L and IGF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHYG.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHYG.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.
VHYG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. VHYG.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYG.L and 0.39% for IGF.
Find the right allocation for VHYG.L and IGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer