VHYD.L vs. QYLD
VHYD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VHYD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHYD.L returned 9.89%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VHYD.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
VHYD.L vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHYD.L achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 6.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VHYD.L having a 9.89% annualized return and QYLD not far behind at 9.69%.
VHYD.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 24.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 8.09%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
VHYD.L vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHYD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 9.52% | 27.03% | 9.32% | 11.43% | -5.45% | 17.84% | -0.31% | 20.75% | -11.71% | 19.33% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 6.22% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHYD.L and QYLD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.37 |
VHYD.L vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHYD.L
QYLD
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
VHYD.L
QYLD
Industrials
VHYD.L
QYLD
Healthcare
VHYD.L
QYLD
Energy
VHYD.L
QYLD
Consumer Defensive
VHYD.L
QYLD
Technology
VHYD.L
QYLD
Consumer Cyclical
VHYD.L
QYLD
Utilities
VHYD.L
QYLD
Basic Materials
VHYD.L
QYLD
Communication Services
VHYD.L
QYLD
Real Estate
VHYD.L
QYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHYD.L vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
VHYD.L
QYLD
VHYD.L vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VHYD.L | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.53 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 4.30 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.40 | 24.77 | -13.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VHYD.L | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.41 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.55 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.63 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.58 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
VHYD.L vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHYD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.60%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYD.L and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHYD.L | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.60% | -24.75% | -11.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -4.97% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.48% | -19.06% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | -24.61% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.60% | -24.75% | -11.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -1.60% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.32% | -3.83% | -1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 0.86% | +1.29% |
Volatility
VHYD.L vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) is 2.67%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that VHYD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHYD.L | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 2.96% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | 7.49% | +1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 8.86% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 14.73% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 15.51% | -0.12% |
VHYD.L vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHYD.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VHYD.L vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
VHYD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than QYLD's 11.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.64% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
VHYD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 2.52% | 2.77% | 3.15% | 3.31% | 3.72% | 3.14% | 2.90% | 3.23% | 3.77% | 2.96% | 3.16% | 3.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHYD.L and QYLD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHYD.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHYD.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
VHYD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. VHYD.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYD.L and 0.60% for QYLD.
Find the right allocation for VHYD.L and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer