VHYD.L vs. VDIV.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (VDIV.DE).
VHYD.L and VDIV.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VHYD.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. It was launched on Sep 24, 2019. VDIV.DE is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. It was launched on May 23, 2016. Both VHYD.L and VDIV.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VHYD.L or VDIV.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between VHYD.L and VDIV.DE is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VHYD.L vs. VDIV.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VHYD.L:
1.43
VDIV.DE:
2.17
VHYD.L:
1.99
VDIV.DE:
2.89
VHYD.L:
1.25
VDIV.DE:
1.40
VHYD.L:
2.15
VDIV.DE:
3.45
VHYD.L:
5.99
VDIV.DE:
13.64
VHYD.L:
2.43%
VDIV.DE:
1.67%
VHYD.L:
10.12%
VDIV.DE:
10.50%
VHYD.L:
-36.60%
VDIV.DE:
-35.90%
VHYD.L:
0.00%
VDIV.DE:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHYD.L achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than VDIV.DE's 7.52% return.
VHYD.L
6.66%
3.60%
3.76%
14.85%
8.14%
6.49%
VDIV.DE
7.52%
2.99%
11.68%
19.95%
13.08%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VHYD.L vs. VDIV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHYD.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than VDIV.DE's 0.38% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VHYD.L vs. VDIV.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
VHYD.L
VDIV.DE
VHYD.L vs. VDIV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (VDIV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VHYD.L vs. VDIV.DE - Dividend Comparison
VHYD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than VDIV.DE's 2.39% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHYD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 2.95% | 3.15% | 3.31% | 3.72% | 3.14% | 2.90% | 3.23% | 3.77% | 2.96% | 3.16% | 3.32% | 3.82% |
VDIV.DE VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 2.39% | 2.57% | 4.97% | 4.56% | 3.97% | 4.11% | 4.35% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VHYD.L vs. VDIV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHYD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.60%, roughly equal to the maximum VDIV.DE drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYD.L and VDIV.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VHYD.L vs. VDIV.DE - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.07% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (VDIV.DE) at 1.82%. This indicates that VHYD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDIV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.