PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHYD.L vs. FUQA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHYD.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHYD.L is traded in USD, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHYD.L achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than FUQA.L's 6.09% return.


VHYD.L

1D
0.78%
1M
0.68%
YTD
11.63%
6M
11.86%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
10.74%

FUQA.L

1D
-0.87%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
6.09%
6M
6.11%
1Y
19.82%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHYD.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
11.63%27.03%9.32%11.43%-5.45%17.84%-0.31%20.75%-11.71%13.26%
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
6.09%16.75%17.51%17.75%-10.69%26.66%11.54%32.33%-4.62%-7.43%

Correlation

The correlation between VHYD.L and FUQA.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.72

The correlation between VHYD.L and FUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

VHYD.L vs. FUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHYD.L
FUQA.L

Financial Services

28.2%
12.4%

Industrials

12.2%
8.7%

Healthcare

11.1%
9.0%

Technology

9.5%
37.1%

Energy

8.7%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
9.3%

Utilities

5.3%
2.0%

Basic Materials

5.2%
2.2%

Communication Services

3.4%
9.8%

Real Estate

0.8%
2.0%

Financial Services

VHYD.L
28.2%
FUQA.L
12.4%

Industrials

VHYD.L
12.2%
FUQA.L
8.7%

Healthcare

VHYD.L
11.1%
FUQA.L
9.0%

Technology

VHYD.L
9.5%
FUQA.L
37.1%

Energy

VHYD.L
8.7%
FUQA.L
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

VHYD.L
8.5%
FUQA.L
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VHYD.L
7.2%
FUQA.L
9.3%

Utilities

VHYD.L
5.3%
FUQA.L
2.0%

Basic Materials

VHYD.L
5.2%
FUQA.L
2.2%

Communication Services

VHYD.L
3.4%
FUQA.L
9.8%

Real Estate

VHYD.L
0.8%
FUQA.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHYD.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHYD.L
VHYD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FUQA.L
FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHYD.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VHYD.LFUQA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.36

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.48

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.49

10.85

+1.64

VHYD.L vs. FUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHYD.L and FUQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VHYD.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHYD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.60%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYD.L and FUQA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHYD.LFUQA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.60%

-35.38%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-7.97%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.48%

-19.14%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.89%

-20.19%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-2.24%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-6.80%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.82%

+0.34%

Volatility

VHYD.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.90%. This indicates that VHYD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHYD.LFUQA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.90%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.81%

7.51%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.80%

10.05%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

19.98%

-6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.27%

23.06%

-7.79%

VHYD.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHYD.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHYD.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

VHYD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.55%2.77%3.15%3.31%3.72%3.14%2.90%3.23%3.77%2.96%3.16%3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHYD.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FUQA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUQA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYD.L.

VHYD.L is categorized as Dividend, while FUQA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. VHYD.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYD.L and 0.25% for FUQA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHYD.L and FUQA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer