VHT vs. XLY
VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHT returned 9.87%/yr vs 12.78%/yr for XLY. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLY.
Performance
VHT vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -2.16% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 9.87%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.
VHT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
XLY
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 11.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
VHT vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.11% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.16% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHT and XLY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VHT and XLY has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VHT vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHT
XLY
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
VHT
XLY
-
Financial Services
VHT
XLY
-
Industrials
VHT
XLY
Technology
VHT
XLY
Basic Materials
VHT
-
XLY
-
Communication Services
VHT
-
XLY
Consumer Cyclical
VHT
-
XLY
Consumer Defensive
VHT
-
XLY
-
Energy
VHT
-
XLY
-
Real Estate
VHT
-
XLY
-
Utilities
VHT
-
XLY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHT vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
VHT
XLY
VHT vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VHT | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.10 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 0.67 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 2.05 | +1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VHT vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHT | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -59.05% | +19.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -14.98% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -26.01% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -39.67% | +21.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.85% | -39.67% | +10.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -6.17% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -9.55% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 4.88% | -0.69% |
Volatility
VHT vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) is 4.88%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that VHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHT | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 6.19% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 13.44% | -2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 18.27% | -3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 23.83% | -8.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 22.08% | -5.11% |
VHT vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VHT vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHT and XLY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLY has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs XLY's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.78% vs 9.87% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLY.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.
VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.13% for XLY.
VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VHT and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer