VHT vs. VYM
VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHT returned 9.26%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for VYM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
VHT vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -4.02% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 9.26%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.
VHT
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- 14.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
VHT vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -4.02% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.47% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHT and VYM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VHT and VYM has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VHT vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHT
VYM
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
VHT
VYM
Financial Services
VHT
VYM
Industrials
VHT
VYM
Technology
VHT
VYM
Basic Materials
VHT
-
VYM
Communication Services
VHT
-
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
VHT
-
VYM
Consumer Defensive
VHT
-
VYM
Energy
VHT
-
VYM
Real Estate
VHT
-
VYM
Utilities
VHT
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHT vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
VHT
VYM
VHT vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VHT | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.46 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 3.93 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 14.76 | -11.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VHT | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 2.56 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.83 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.73 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.51 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
VHT vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHT | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -56.98% | +17.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -6.69% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -14.46% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -15.84% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.85% | -35.21% | +6.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.05% | -0.43% | -6.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -7.19% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 1.78% | +2.36% |
Volatility
VHT vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.77%. This indicates that VHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHT | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 2.77% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 7.67% | +2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 10.28% | +4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 13.96% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 16.34% | +0.60% |
VHT vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VHT vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.71% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHT and VYM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VHT has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.90% vs 9.26% for VHT. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VHT.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.71% for VHT.
VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VHT and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VHT and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer