PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHT vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHT vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -4.02% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 9.26%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.


VHT

1D
0.84%
1M
1.45%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-4.15%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
9.26%

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHT vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-4.02%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VHT and VYM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between VHT and VYM has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VHT vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHT
VYM

Healthcare

100.0%
12.2%

Financial Services

0.0%
20.5%

Industrials

0.0%
12.1%

Technology

0.0%
17.7%

Basic Materials

-

3.5%

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.1%

Energy

-

9.8%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

5.7%

Healthcare

VHT
100.0%
VYM
12.2%

Financial Services

VHT
0.0%
VYM
20.5%

Industrials

VHT
0.0%
VYM
12.1%

Technology

VHT
0.0%
VYM
17.7%

Basic Materials

VHT

-

VYM
3.5%

Communication Services

VHT

-

VYM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VHT

-

VYM
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

VHT

-

VYM
8.1%

Energy

VHT

-

VYM
9.8%

Real Estate

VHT

-

VYM
0.0%

Utilities

VHT

-

VYM
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHT vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHT vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHTVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.46

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

3.93

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

14.76

-11.29

VHT vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHT Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHT and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHTVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

2.56

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.83

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.73

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.51

+0.05

Drawdowns

VHT vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHTVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.12%

-56.98%

+17.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-6.69%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.91%

-14.46%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-15.84%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.85%

-35.21%

+6.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.05%

-0.43%

-6.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-7.19%

+1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

1.78%

+2.36%

Volatility

VHT vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.77%. This indicates that VHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHTVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

2.77%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

7.67%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

10.28%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

13.96%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

16.34%

+0.60%

VHT vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VHT vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.71%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHT and VYM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VHT has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.90% vs 9.26% for VHT. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VHT.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.71% for VHT.

VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VHT and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHT and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer