VGT vs. VTG
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG).
VGT and VTG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2004. VTG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2025. Both VGT and VTG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
VGT vs. VTG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VGT vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | -5.36% | 11.61% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 0.14% | 2.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly lower than VTG's 0.14% return.
VGT
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 6M
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- 29.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.02%
- 10Y*
- 21.67%
VTG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VGT vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
VTG
VGT vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGT | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGT | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.17 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and VTG is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
VGT vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than VTG's 2.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 2.60% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VGT vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than VTG's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and VTG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -2.35% | -52.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.90% | -1.65% | -9.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -0.50% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | — | — |
Volatility
VGT vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.27% | 3.56% | +23.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 3.56% | +21.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 3.56% | +20.91% |