PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. VPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. VPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.57% return, which is significantly higher than VPU's 2.68% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed VPU with an annualized return of 25.14%, while VPU has yielded a comparatively lower 8.85% annualized return.


VGT

1D
1.71%
1M
4.28%
YTD
24.57%
6M
21.33%
1Y
50.38%
3Y*
31.24%
5Y*
20.82%
10Y*
25.14%

VPU

1D
-1.87%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
2.68%
6M
3.11%
1Y
10.68%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
8.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. VPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.57%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%
VPU
Vanguard Utilities ETF
2.68%16.46%23.04%-7.45%1.06%17.40%-0.74%24.89%4.38%12.44%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and VPU is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between VGT and VPU has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VGT vs. VPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGT
VPU

Technology

98.5%

-

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Financial Services

0.5%

-

Industrials

0.4%
0.2%

Energy

0.3%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

99.3%

Technology

VGT
98.5%
VPU

-

Communication Services

VGT
0.5%
VPU

-

Financial Services

VGT
0.5%
VPU

-

Industrials

VGT
0.4%
VPU
0.2%

Energy

VGT
0.3%
VPU
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VGT
0.1%
VPU

-

Basic Materials

VGT
0.0%
VPU

-

Healthcare

VGT
0.0%
VPU

-

Consumer Defensive

VGT

-

VPU

-

Real Estate

VGT

-

VPU

-

Utilities

VGT

-

VPU
99.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. VPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VPU
VPU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. VPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGTVPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.14

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

1.20

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

2.66

+7.11

VGT vs. VPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the VPU Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and VPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGTVPUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

0.75

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.52

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

0.46

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.53

+0.14

Drawdowns

VGT vs. VPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than VPU's maximum drawdown of -46.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and VPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTVPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-46.31%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-8.90%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-17.34%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-25.15%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-36.42%

+1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-7.71%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-7.78%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

4.02%

+1.15%

Volatility

VGT vs. VPU - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) at 5.56%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTVPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

5.56%

+3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.44%

11.53%

+5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

14.38%

+7.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

17.07%

+8.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

19.14%

+5.55%

VGT vs. VPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VGT and VPU have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGT vs. VPU - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VPU's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VPU
Vanguard Utilities ETF
2.70%2.73%3.02%3.49%2.98%2.70%3.17%2.83%3.23%3.18%3.19%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGT and VPU have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to VPU (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs VPU's -46.31%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.14% vs 8.85% for VPU. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VPU has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT and VPU have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

VPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while VPU is Utilities Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while VPU tracks MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and VPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer