VGT vs. TRUT
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. VGT is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
VGT vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 16.57% return.
VGT
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 22.48%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 49.26%
- 3Y*
- 30.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 24.81%
TRUT
- 1D
- -5.65%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- 16.57%
- 6M
- 14.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 22.48% | 10.75% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 16.57% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and TRUT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
TRUT
VGT vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.67 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
VGT vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -18.55% | -36.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.34% | -8.33% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -5.17% | -2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.15% | — | — |
Volatility
VGT vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 22.47% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.31% | 22.47% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 22.47% | +2.21% |
VGT vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGT vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than TRUT's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.20% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, VGT and TRUT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for TRUT.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.20% for TRUT.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for VGT and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer