VGT vs. TQQQ
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.14%/yr vs 43.95%/yr for TQQQ. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
VGT vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.57% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 44.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 25.14%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 43.95% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 24.57%
- 6M
- 21.33%
- 1Y
- 50.38%
- 3Y*
- 31.24%
- 5Y*
- 20.82%
- 10Y*
- 25.14%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 44.91%
- 6M
- 37.12%
- 1Y
- 106.99%
- 3Y*
- 62.78%
- 5Y*
- 24.89%
- 10Y*
- 43.95%
VGT vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.57% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 44.91% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and TQQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010 | 0.96 |
The correlation between VGT and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VGT vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
TQQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VGT
TQQQ
Communication Services
VGT
TQQQ
Financial Services
VGT
TQQQ
Industrials
VGT
TQQQ
Energy
VGT
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
TQQQ
Basic Materials
VGT
TQQQ
Healthcare
VGT
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
VGT
-
TQQQ
Utilities
VGT
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
TQQQ
VGT vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGT | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.33 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.91 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | 9.45 | +0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGT | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.16 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.37 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | 0.67 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.72 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
VGT vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -81.66% | +27.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -36.97% | +20.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -58.04% | +30.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -81.66% | +46.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -81.66% | +46.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -12.55% | +5.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -18.52% | +10.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 11.36% | -6.19% |
Volatility
VGT vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is 9.39%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.84%. This indicates that VGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 20.84% | -11.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 39.54% | -22.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.58% | 49.94% | -28.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 66.84% | -41.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 66.15% | -41.46% |
VGT vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGT vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than TQQQ's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.41% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, VGT and TQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TQQQ has higher volatility (20.84%) compared to VGT (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 43.95% vs 25.14% for VGT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 9.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 43.95% return vs 25.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.95% for TQQQ.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer