VGT vs. IYH
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.14%/yr vs 9.38%/yr for IYH. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IYH.
Performance
VGT vs. IYH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.57% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's -1.29% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed IYH with an annualized return of 25.14%, while IYH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.38% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 24.57%
- 6M
- 21.33%
- 1Y
- 50.38%
- 3Y*
- 31.24%
- 5Y*
- 20.82%
- 10Y*
- 25.14%
IYH
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- -1.29%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 15.28%
- 3Y*
- 6.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
VGT vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.57% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | -1.29% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and IYH is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VGT and IYH has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VGT vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
IYH
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
VGT
IYH
-
Communication Services
VGT
IYH
-
Financial Services
VGT
IYH
-
Industrials
VGT
IYH
-
Energy
VGT
IYH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
IYH
-
Basic Materials
VGT
IYH
-
Healthcare
VGT
IYH
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
IYH
-
Real Estate
VGT
-
IYH
-
Utilities
VGT
-
IYH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
IYH
VGT vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGT | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.18 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 1.44 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | 3.45 | +6.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGT | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 1.02 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.33 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | 0.56 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.43 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
VGT vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than IYH's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and IYH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -43.12% | -11.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -10.64% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -17.91% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -17.91% | -17.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -28.40% | -6.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -4.56% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -8.96% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 4.43% | +0.74% |
Volatility
VGT vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) at 4.97%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 4.97% | +4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 10.67% | +6.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.58% | 15.03% | +6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 14.97% | +10.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 16.74% | +7.95% |
VGT vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGT vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than IYH's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.26% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and IYH have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to IYH (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs IYH's -43.12%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.14% vs 9.38% for IYH. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.
IYH has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.43% for IYH.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and IYH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer