PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. IDGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 22.82% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 42.89% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed IDGT with an annualized return of 25.77%, while IDGT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.65% annualized return.


VGT

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
22.82%
6M
20.81%
1Y
42.45%
3Y*
30.31%
5Y*
19.42%
10Y*
25.77%

IDGT

1D
-0.49%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
42.89%
6M
41.41%
1Y
49.75%
3Y*
23.17%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
14.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.82%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
42.89%6.79%26.71%-6.09%-17.90%42.14%8.78%17.39%-1.97%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and IDGT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.79

The correlation between VGT and IDGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (3 years) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VGT vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGT
IDGT

Technology

98.5%
56.9%

Communication Services

0.5%
6.7%

Financial Services

0.5%

-

Industrials

0.4%

-

Energy

0.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

35.5%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

VGT
98.5%
IDGT
56.9%

Communication Services

VGT
0.5%
IDGT
6.7%

Financial Services

VGT
0.5%
IDGT

-

Industrials

VGT
0.4%
IDGT

-

Energy

VGT
0.3%
IDGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

VGT
0.1%
IDGT

-

Basic Materials

VGT
0.0%
IDGT

-

Healthcare

VGT
0.0%
IDGT

-

Consumer Defensive

VGT

-

IDGT

-

Real Estate

VGT

-

IDGT
35.5%

Utilities

VGT

-

IDGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGTIDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

5.54

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

15.44

-7.57

VGT vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGT vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and IDGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTIDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-77.95%

+23.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-9.02%

-7.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-23.74%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-35.83%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-36.88%

+1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.08%

-8.62%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-19.88%

+11.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

3.23%

+2.18%

Volatility

VGT vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 8.46%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTIDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.17%

8.46%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.51%

17.71%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.66%

21.40%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.55%

23.36%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.76%

23.32%

+1.44%

VGT vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGT vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than IDGT's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.75%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.45%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGT and IDGT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to IDGT (8.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.77% vs 14.65% for IDGT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 8.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.77% return vs 14.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for IDGT.

IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.45% for VGT.

VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.41% for IDGT.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and IDGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer