VGT vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.19%/yr vs 21.66%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

VGT vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 13.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 25.19%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 21.66% annualized return.

VGT

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 24.03%
• 6M: 24.13%
• 1Y: 47.99%
• 3Y*: 29.84%
• 5Y*: 20.35%
• 10Y*: 25.19%

FBGRX

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 13.86%
• 6M: 15.39%
• 1Y: 36.93%
• 3Y*: 30.04%
• 5Y*: 15.33%
• 10Y*: 21.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	24.03%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	30.45%	46.04%	48.62%	2.46%	37.08%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	13.86%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and FBGRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004	0.92

The correlation between VGT and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VGT vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 70
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 72
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VGT	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.05	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	2.66	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.35	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	2.95	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.11	12.23	-3.12

VGT vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VGT vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VGT	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.63%	-58.64%	+4.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.40%	-12.65%	-3.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.23%	-27.07%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.07%	-43.08%	+8.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.07%	-43.08%	+8.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.18%	-3.97%	-3.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-12.52%	+4.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.28%	3.05%	+2.23%

Volatility

VGT vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 6.86%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VGT	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.00%	6.86%	+3.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.00%	14.15%	+3.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.00%	18.25%	+3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.40%	24.99%	+0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.72%	23.74%	+0.98%

VGT vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

VGT vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than FBGRX's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.67%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.33%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VGT and FBGRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, VGT and FBGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VGT or FBGRX?

VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to FBGRX (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.