PortfoliosLab logo
FBGRX vs. FLCNX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FBGRX and FLCNX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FBGRX vs. FLCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FBGRX:

28.19%

FLCNX:

11.20%

Max Drawdown

FBGRX:

-57.42%

FLCNX:

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

FBGRX:

-14.29%

FLCNX:

0.00%

Returns By Period


FBGRX

YTD

-10.08%

1M

7.68%

6M

-9.47%

1Y

1.21%

5Y*

12.95%

10Y*

11.50%

FLCNX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBGRX vs. FLCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCNX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBGRX vs. FLCNX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLCNX is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLCNX is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FBGRX vs. FLCNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

FBGRX vs. FLCNX - Dividend Comparison

FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than FLCNX's 0.28% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.26%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBGRX vs. FLCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBGRX drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, which is greater than FLCNX's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGRX and FLCNX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FBGRX vs. FLCNX - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...