VGT vs. CRTC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - VGT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VGT returned 39.97% vs 17.59% for CRTC. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

VGT vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 27.80% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 11.49% return.

VGT

• 1D: 4.35%
• 1M: 4.81%
• 6M: 30.81%
• YTD: 27.80%
• 1Y: 39.97%
• 3Y*: 30.95%
• 5Y*: 18.95%
• 10Y*: 24.54%
• ALL TIME*: 15.14%

CRTC

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: 5.00%
• 6M: 10.51%
• YTD: 11.49%
• 1Y: 17.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	$223.70K	$605.96K	$501.22K
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	$485.01M	$516.15M	$578.25M

VGT vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	27.80%	21.77%	29.30%	6.60%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	11.49%	18.69%	18.05%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and CRTC is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	0.86

The correlation between VGT and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

VGT vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VGT	CRTC
Technology	98.6%	39.6%
Communication Services	0.5%	14.0%
Financial Services	0.5%	0.1%
Industrials	0.4%	13.4%
Energy	0.3%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	4.9%
Basic Materials	0.0%	3.0%
Healthcare	0.0%	13.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	5.5%

Return for Risk

VGT vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 58
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 45
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 41
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VGT vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VGT	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.26	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	1.76	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.22	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	1.95	+0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.57	6.13	+0.44

VGT vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VGT vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	VGT	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.63%	-19.07%	-35.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.40%	-9.05%	-7.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.35%	0.00%	-4.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-2.22%	-5.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.10%	2.88%	+3.22%

Volatility

VGT vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 4.53%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VGT	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.26%	4.53%	+4.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.52%	11.14%	+9.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.56%	14.12%	+10.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.92%	15.84%	+10.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.93%	15.84%	+9.09%

VGT vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VGT vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than CRTC's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.85%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.36%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VGT and CRTC in my portfolio?

VGT and CRTC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VGT or CRTC?

VGT has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to CRTC (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, VGT or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, VGT leads with 39.97% vs 17.59% for CRTC. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VGT or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, VGT has performed better with a 39.97% return vs 17.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VGT or CRTC?

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CRTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VGT or CRTC?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.36% for VGT.

What is the main difference between VGT and CRTC?

VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.