VGT vs. CELH
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while CELH (Celsius Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.34%/yr vs 45.43%/yr for CELH. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VGT vs. CELH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.69% return, which is significantly higher than CELH's -30.32% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has underperformed CELH with an annualized return of 25.34%, while CELH has yielded a comparatively higher 45.43% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- 24.69%
- 6M
- 24.69%
- 1Y
- 43.49%
- 3Y*
- 29.21%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 25.34%
CELH
- 1D
- 8.85%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- -30.32%
- 6M
- -30.32%
- 1Y
- -30.72%
- 3Y*
- -13.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 45.43%
VGT vs. CELH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.69% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | -30.32% | 73.65% | -51.69% | 57.21% | 39.52% | 48.22% | 941.61% | 39.19% | -33.90% | 114.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and CELH is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VGT and CELH has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. CELH — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
CELH
VGT vs. CELH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGT | CELH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.94 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | -0.54 | +3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | -0.95 | +8.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGT vs. CELH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum CELH drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and CELH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | CELH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -77.86% | +23.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -57.22% | +40.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -77.86% | +50.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -77.86% | +42.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -77.86% | +42.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.69% | -66.84% | +60.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -28.11% | +20.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 32.43% | -26.95% |
Volatility
VGT vs. CELH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is 11.38%, while Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that VGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CELH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | CELH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.38% | 16.25% | -4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.95% | 38.58% | -19.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.00% | 57.29% | -34.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.62% | 65.48% | -39.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.77% | 69.04% | -44.27% |
Dividends
VGT vs. CELH - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while CELH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.37% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and CELH have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CELH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to VGT (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs CELH's -77.86%.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and CELH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer