VGT vs. CALF
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VGT returned 20.35%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for CALF. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
VGT vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than CALF's 14.10% return.
VGT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 50.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
CALF
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 30.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
VGT vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 16.89% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 14.10% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and CALF is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.55 |
The correlation between VGT and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VGT vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
CALF
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
VGT
CALF
Communication Services
VGT
CALF
Financial Services
VGT
CALF
Industrials
VGT
CALF
Energy
VGT
CALF
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
CALF
Basic Materials
VGT
CALF
Healthcare
VGT
CALF
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
CALF
Real Estate
VGT
-
CALF
Utilities
VGT
-
CALF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
CALF
VGT vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGT | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.33 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 4.77 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | 13.43 | -4.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGT vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than CALF's maximum drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -47.58% | -7.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -6.15% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -34.22% | +6.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -34.22% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -1.29% | -5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -10.71% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 2.18% | +3.10% |
Volatility
VGT vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) at 4.93%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 4.93% | +5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.00% | 10.67% | +7.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 15.90% | +6.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 23.43% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 25.99% | -1.27% |
VGT vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGT vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than CALF's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.20% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and CALF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to CALF (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs CALF's -47.58%.
On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 20.35% vs 3.80% for CALF. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 20.35% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.59% for CALF.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer