VGT vs. ARKQ
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK. VGT is passively managed, while ARKQ is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.72%/yr vs 22.08%/yr for ARKQ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKQ.
Performance
VGT vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 28.27% return, which is significantly higher than ARKQ's 17.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed ARKQ with an annualized return of 25.72%, while ARKQ has yielded a comparatively lower 22.08% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 28.27%
- 6M
- 29.82%
- 1Y
- 55.62%
- 3Y*
- 30.76%
- 5Y*
- 21.17%
- 10Y*
- 25.72%
ARKQ
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 17.47%
- 6M
- 19.36%
- 1Y
- 64.14%
- 3Y*
- 34.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 22.08%
VGT vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 28.27% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 17.47% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -46.75% | 1.74% | 107.20% | 25.94% | -7.89% | 52.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and ARKQ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.77 |
The correlation between VGT and ARKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
VGT vs. ARKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
ARKQ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VGT
ARKQ
Communication Services
VGT
ARKQ
Financial Services
VGT
ARKQ
-
Industrials
VGT
ARKQ
Energy
VGT
ARKQ
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
ARKQ
Basic Materials
VGT
ARKQ
-
Healthcare
VGT
ARKQ
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
ARKQ
-
Real Estate
VGT
-
ARKQ
-
Utilities
VGT
-
ARKQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
ARKQ
VGT vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGT | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.30 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.13 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.55 | 9.22 | +1.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGT vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and ARKQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -59.89% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -20.58% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -30.76% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -55.71% | +20.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -59.89% | +24.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.01% | -6.35% | +2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -17.21% | +9.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.29% | 6.98% | -1.69% |
Volatility
VGT vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is 10.42%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 13.37%. This indicates that VGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.42% | 13.37% | -2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.28% | 26.41% | -8.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.20% | 33.76% | -11.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 32.56% | -7.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 30.01% | -5.26% |
VGT vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGT vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than ARKQ's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKQ has higher volatility (13.37%) compared to VGT (10.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.72% vs 22.08% for ARKQ. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 10.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.72% return vs 22.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while ARKQ is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.75% for ARKQ.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and ARKQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer