PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGSLX vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGSLX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGSLX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGSLX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VGSLX has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 5.20%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


VGSLX

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
7.97%
6M
6.88%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
5.20%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGSLX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGSLX
Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund Admiral Shares
7.97%3.18%3.67%13.13%-26.20%40.39%-4.75%28.90%-5.99%4.91%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VGSLX and VUG is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between VGSLX and VUG has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VGSLX vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGSLX
VUG

Real Estate

83.1%
1.0%

Financial Services

14.7%
4.3%

Basic Materials

0.9%
0.6%

Communication Services

0.5%
17.3%

Technology

0.3%
53.5%

Energy

0.1%
0.4%

Industrials

0.0%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.5%

Healthcare

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

0.9%

Real Estate

VGSLX
83.1%
VUG
1.0%

Financial Services

VGSLX
14.7%
VUG
4.3%

Basic Materials

VGSLX
0.9%
VUG
0.6%

Communication Services

VGSLX
0.5%
VUG
17.3%

Technology

VGSLX
0.3%
VUG
53.5%

Energy

VGSLX
0.1%
VUG
0.4%

Industrials

VGSLX
0.0%
VUG
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VGSLX

-

VUG
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

VGSLX

-

VUG
1.5%

Healthcare

VGSLX

-

VUG
4.6%

Utilities

VGSLX

-

VUG
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGSLX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGSLX
VGSLX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VGSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGSLX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGSLX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGSLXVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.31

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

1.69

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.75

5.92

-2.17

VGSLX vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGSLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGSLX and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGSLXVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.77

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.68

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.85

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.62

-0.30

Drawdowns

VGSLX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGSLX drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGSLX and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGSLXVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.05%

-50.68%

-22.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-16.53%

+8.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.41%

-22.85%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-35.61%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

-35.61%

-6.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.58%

-1.51%

-2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.58%

-7.09%

-5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

4.71%

-2.08%

Volatility

VGSLX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGSLX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 3.79% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGSLXVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

3.83%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

12.11%

-2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

15.84%

-2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.87%

22.22%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

21.44%

-0.59%

VGSLX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGSLX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGSLX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

VGSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGSLX
Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.69%3.92%3.85%3.91%3.91%2.56%3.92%3.39%4.73%4.23%4.82%3.92%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGSLX and VUG have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VGSLX (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGSLX dropped -73.05% vs VUG's -50.68%.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGSLX and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer