PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGSH vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGSH vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGSH achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VGSH has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 1.73%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.50% annualized return.


VGSH

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.83%
1Y
3.36%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
1.73%

SCHG

1D
0.12%
1M
-3.66%
YTD
2.58%
6M
2.96%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
18.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGSH vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
0.57%5.07%4.00%4.31%-3.86%-0.60%3.04%3.52%1.55%0.04%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.58%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VGSH and SCHG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

-0.12

The correlation between VGSH and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGSH vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGSH
VGSH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VGSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGSH vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGSHSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.21

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

1.14

+2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.67

3.78

+10.89

VGSH vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGSH and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGSH vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGSH drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGSH and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGSHSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-34.59%

+28.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.88%

-16.41%

+15.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.97%

-23.39%

+22.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.66%

-34.59%

+28.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.70%

-34.59%

+28.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-5.33%

+5.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-5.20%

+4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

4.96%

-4.73%

Volatility

VGSH vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) is 0.37%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that VGSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGSHSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

5.14%

-4.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.90%

12.30%

-11.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28%

15.95%

-14.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.97%

22.33%

-20.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.58%

21.58%

-20.00%

VGSH vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGSH has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGSH vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

VGSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
3.87%4.00%4.18%3.31%1.15%0.66%1.74%2.28%1.79%1.10%0.84%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGSH and SCHG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to VGSH (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGSH dropped -5.70% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.50% vs 1.73% for VGSH. On fees, VGSH is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 1.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGSH is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHG.

VGSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

VGSH is categorized as Government Bonds, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VGSH tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGSH and 0.04% for SCHG.

VGSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGSH and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer