PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VGRO vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VGRO vs. MFUS

Last updated Jul 30, 2026
Documentation

VGRO (Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. VGRO is actively managed, while MFUS is passively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VGRO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.

Performance

VGRO vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF (VGRO) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGRO achieves a -3.29% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 14.90% return.

VGRO

1D
-1.60%
1M
-4.62%
6M
-2.34%
YTD
-3.29%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

MFUS

1D
-1.46%
1M
-3.20%
6M
10.80%
YTD
14.90%
1Y
21.95%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
13.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

MFUS

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
$1.62M$1.22M$1.04M

VGRO

Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF
$13.12K$11.58K$24.68K

VGRO vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
VGRO
Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF		-3.29%-0.88%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF		14.90%-0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between VGRO and MFUS is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.56

VGRO vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VGRO
MFUS

Technology

48.7%
25.8%

Communication Services

20.1%
4.6%

Industrials

9.5%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
9.3%

Healthcare

7.3%
14.7%

Utilities

4.7%
1.3%

Financial Services

4.2%
11.3%

Basic Materials

1.5%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.3%

Energy

-

6.6%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Technology

VGRO
48.7%
MFUS
25.8%

Communication Services

VGRO
20.1%
MFUS
4.6%

Industrials

VGRO
9.5%
MFUS
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VGRO
7.8%
MFUS
9.3%

Healthcare

VGRO
7.3%
MFUS
14.7%

Utilities

VGRO
4.7%
MFUS
1.3%

Financial Services

VGRO
4.2%
MFUS
11.3%

Basic Materials

VGRO
1.5%
MFUS
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

VGRO

-

MFUS
9.3%

Energy

VGRO

-

MFUS
6.6%

Real Estate

VGRO

-

MFUS
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF

Often compared with VGRO:
VGRO vs. SCHGVGRO vs. DGROVGRO vs. VUGVGRO vs. ILCBVGRO vs. DARPVGRO vs. PBUSVGRO vs. LRNZ
Often compared with MFUS:
MFUS vs. RWLMFUS vs. FNDXMFUS vs. VOOVMFUS vs. AVUSMFUS vs. SPYMFUS vs. AVLVMFUS vs. DGRW

Return for Risk

VGRO vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
VGRO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VGRO vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF (VGRO) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VGROMFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.93

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

2.81

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.35

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

3.45

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

13.19

—

VGRO vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGRO vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGRO drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGRO and MFUS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VGROMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.49%

-35.21%

+19.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-6.39%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-15.39%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-18.22%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.63%

-3.57%

-7.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-3.95%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

1.67%

—

Volatility

VGRO vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VGROMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

3.02%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

9.09%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.46%

11.41%

+8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.46%

15.02%

+4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.46%

17.29%

+2.17%

VGRO vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGRO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

VGRO vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

VGRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF		1.39%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%
VGRO
Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

VGRO and MFUS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VGRO.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for VGRO.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VGRO and 0.30% for MFUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGRO and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer