VGK vs. RING
VGK (Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF) and RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGK is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Europe All Cap Index, while RING is a Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGK returned 10.28%/yr vs 13.85%/yr for RING. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VGK charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RING.
Performance
VGK vs. RING - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGK achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly higher than RING's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, VGK has underperformed RING with an annualized return of 10.28%, while RING has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.
VGK
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 9.92%
- 1Y
- 19.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
RING
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- -5.54%
- 6M
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- 54.08%
- 3Y*
- 44.87%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.85%
VGK vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGK Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF | 7.69% | 35.83% | 1.88% | 20.19% | -15.98% | 16.89% | 5.43% | 24.85% | -14.89% | 26.98% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | -5.54% | 164.72% | 15.98% | 12.29% | -15.40% | -7.46% | 24.98% | 49.92% | -13.14% | 10.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGK and RING is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.29 |
The correlation between VGK and RING shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VGK vs. RING - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGK
RING
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VGK
RING
-
Industrials
VGK
RING
-
Healthcare
VGK
RING
-
Consumer Defensive
VGK
RING
-
Technology
VGK
RING
-
Consumer Cyclical
VGK
RING
-
Basic Materials
VGK
RING
Energy
VGK
RING
-
Utilities
VGK
RING
-
Communication Services
VGK
RING
-
Real Estate
VGK
RING
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGK vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank
VGK
RING
VGK vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (VGK) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGK | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.59 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | 4.45 | +1.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGK vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGK drawdown since its inception was -63.61%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGK and RING.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGK | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.61% | -79.47% | +15.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.09% | -35.72% | +23.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | -35.72% | +21.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.74% | -47.94% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.24% | -52.04% | +14.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -30.03% | +29.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.33% | -47.36% | +34.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 12.74% | -9.47% |
Volatility
VGK vs. RING - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (VGK) is 5.82%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 16.83%. This indicates that VGK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGK | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 16.83% | -11.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.36% | 39.11% | -25.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 47.31% | -31.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 36.81% | -18.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 36.70% | -17.75% |
VGK vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGK has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGK vs. RING - Dividend Comparison
VGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than RING's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 0.89% | 0.84% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.41% | 0.96% |
VGK Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF | 2.76% | 2.86% | 3.61% | 3.15% | 3.25% | 3.05% | 2.11% | 3.27% | 3.95% | 2.70% | 3.52% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGK and RING have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RING has higher volatility (16.83%) compared to VGK (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGK dropped -63.61% vs RING's -79.47%.
On 10-year performance, RING leads with 13.85% vs 10.28% for VGK. On fees, VGK is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RING has performed better with a 13.85% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGK is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RING.
VGK has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.89% for RING.
VGK is categorized as Europe Equities, while RING is Gold. VGK tracks FTSE Developed Europe All Cap Index, while RING tracks MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VGK and 0.39% for RING.
RING currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGK and RING
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer