VFVA vs. VTWG
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG).
VFVA and VTWG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VFVA is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018. VTWG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VFVA or VTWG.
Correlation
The correlation between VFVA and VTWG is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VFVA vs. VTWG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VFVA:
0.51
VTWG:
0.83
VFVA:
0.84
VTWG:
1.27
VFVA:
1.10
VTWG:
1.15
VFVA:
0.91
VTWG:
0.65
VFVA:
2.38
VTWG:
4.30
VFVA:
3.52%
VTWG:
4.17%
VFVA:
16.51%
VTWG:
21.69%
VFVA:
-48.58%
VTWG:
-42.07%
VFVA:
-9.15%
VTWG:
-11.86%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFVA achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than VTWG's 15.36% return.
VFVA
6.75%
-5.71%
6.65%
6.73%
11.08%
N/A
VTWG
15.36%
-1.78%
11.24%
15.85%
6.91%
8.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VFVA vs. VTWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFVA has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VFVA vs. VTWG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VFVA vs. VTWG - Dividend Comparison
VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than VTWG's 0.36% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.77% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.09% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.72% | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.96% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
VFVA vs. VTWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFVA drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than VTWG's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFVA and VTWG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VFVA vs. VTWG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) is 4.60%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that VFVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.