VFVA vs. VTWG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VFVA (Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF) and VTWG (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFVA is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while VTWG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth Index. VFVA is actively managed, while VTWG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFVA returned 9.48%/yr vs 5.70%/yr for VTWG. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFVA charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VTWG.

Performance

VFVA vs. VTWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFVA achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly lower than VTWG's 16.90% return.

VFVA

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 9.50%
• 6M: 10.40%
• 1Y: 28.50%
• 3Y*: 17.34%
• 5Y*: 9.48%
• 10Y*: —

VTWG

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 4.49%
• YTD: 16.90%
• 6M: 15.29%
• 1Y: 37.62%
• 3Y*: 18.23%
• 5Y*: 5.70%
• 10Y*: 11.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFVA vs. VTWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF	9.50%	14.77%	7.67%	17.37%	-3.96%	36.94%	2.28%	25.42%	-15.61%
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF	16.90%	13.07%	15.15%	18.90%	-26.49%	2.84%	34.72%	28.75%	-10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VFVA and VTWG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018	0.78

The correlation between VFVA and VTWG shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFVA vs. VTWG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VFVA	VTWG
Financial Services	25.7%	8.2%
Healthcare	14.9%	22.4%
Technology	14.5%	23.5%
Consumer Cyclical	13.1%	7.7%
Industrials	7.6%	23.1%
Energy	7.3%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	2.6%
Communication Services	6.2%	2.2%
Basic Materials	3.3%	4.2%
Real Estate	0.4%	2.1%
Utilities	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

VFVA vs. VTWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFVA

VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 58
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 59

VTWG

VTWG Risk / Return Rank: 49
VTWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
VTWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
VTWG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
VTWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
VTWG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFVA vs. VTWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VFVA	VTWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.76	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	2.44	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.29	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	2.54	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.61	9.16	+1.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VFVA vs. VTWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFVA Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the VTWG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFVA and VTWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VFVA	VTWG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	1.76	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.23	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.52	-0.09

Drawdowns

VFVA vs. VTWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFVA drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than VTWG's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFVA and VTWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFVA	VTWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.58%	-42.07%	-6.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.55%	-14.88%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.07%	-28.58%	+4.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.07%	-40.49%	+16.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	-1.39%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.31%	-10.53%	+3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.69%	4.12%	-1.43%

Volatility

VFVA vs. VTWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) is 3.36%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that VFVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFVA	VTWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	6.62%	-3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.81%	15.90%	-6.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.35%	21.50%	-6.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	24.52%	-4.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.32%	24.21%	+0.11%

VFVA vs. VTWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFVA has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VFVA vs. VTWG - Dividend Comparison

VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than VTWG's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF	1.95%	2.13%	2.40%	2.45%	2.21%	1.68%	2.04%	2.08%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF	0.59%	0.64%	0.55%	0.79%	0.71%	0.54%	0.48%	0.72%	0.72%	0.64%	0.96%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFVA and VTWG in my portfolio?

VFVA and VTWG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VFVA or VTWG?

VTWG has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to VFVA (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFVA dropped -48.58% vs VTWG's -42.07%.

Which ETF is better, VFVA or VTWG?

On 5-year performance, VFVA leads with 9.48% vs 5.70% for VTWG. On fees, VFVA is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFVA has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VFVA or VTWG?

Over the 5-year period, VFVA has performed better with a 9.48% return vs 5.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VFVA or VTWG?

VFVA is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VTWG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VFVA or VTWG?

VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.59% for VTWG.

What is the main difference between VFVA and VTWG?

VFVA is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VTWG is Small Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFVA and 0.15% for VTWG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.