VFVA vs. TMVE
VFVA (Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF) and TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. VFVA is actively managed, while TMVE is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFVA charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMVE.
Performance
VFVA vs. TMVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFVA achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than TMVE's 17.39% return.
VFVA
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 9.71%
- 1Y
- 27.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- —
TMVE
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFVA vs. TMVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 10.62% | 5.52% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 17.39% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFVA and TMVE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFVA vs. TMVE — Risk / Return Rank
VFVA
TMVE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFVA vs. TMVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFVA | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFVA vs. TMVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFVA drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than TMVE's maximum drawdown of -8.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFVA and TMVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFVA | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.58% | -8.21% | -40.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -0.69% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -1.43% | -5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | — | — |
Volatility
VFVA vs. TMVE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFVA | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | 13.81% | +1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 13.81% | +6.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.30% | 13.81% | +10.49% |
VFVA vs. TMVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFVA has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than TMVE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFVA vs. TMVE - Dividend Comparison
VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than TMVE's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.42% | 2.13% | 2.40% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFVA and TMVE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFVA is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFVA is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMVE.
VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFVA and 0.55% for TMVE.
Find the right allocation for VFVA and TMVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer