PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFSTX vs. LQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFSTX vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares (VFSTX) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VFSTX having a 0.77% return and LQD slightly lower at 0.74%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VFSTX having a 2.54% annualized return and LQD not far ahead at 2.55%.


VFSTX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.15%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
2.28%
10Y*
2.54%

LQD

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.47%
1Y
6.42%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
0.15%
10Y*
2.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFSTX vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFSTX
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares
0.77%6.75%4.98%6.06%-5.84%-0.70%5.16%5.75%0.87%2.02%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.74%7.90%0.86%9.40%-17.92%-1.84%10.97%17.37%-3.79%7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VFSTX and LQD is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2002

0.62

The correlation between VFSTX and LQD shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.75 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFSTX vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFSTX
VFSTX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VFSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VFSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

LQD
LQD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQD Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQD Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFSTX vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares (VFSTX) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFSTXLQDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.00

1.20

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

1.77

+1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.21

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

1.83

+1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.96

5.26

+6.70

VFSTX vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFSTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFSTX and LQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFSTXLQDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.20

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.02

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.29

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.54

+0.97

Drawdowns

VFSTX vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFSTX drawdown since its inception was -9.35%, smaller than the maximum LQD drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFSTX and LQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFSTXLQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-24.95%

+15.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.71%

-3.34%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.71%

-8.43%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.35%

-24.95%

+15.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.35%

-24.95%

+15.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-3.45%

+3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-3.99%

+2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

1.16%

-0.73%

Volatility

VFSTX vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares (VFSTX) is 0.74%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that VFSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFSTXLQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

1.66%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.67%

3.92%

-2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31%

5.36%

-3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.98%

8.65%

-5.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.48%

8.68%

-6.20%

VFSTX vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFSTX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFSTX vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

VFSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than LQD's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.56%4.48%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%
VFSTX
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares
4.61%4.48%4.06%3.05%1.93%1.70%2.24%2.83%2.68%2.00%2.04%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFSTX and LQD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LQD has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to VFSTX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFSTX dropped -9.35% vs LQD's -24.95%.

VFSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFSTX and LQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer