VFQY vs. VONV
VFQY (Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and VONV (Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFQY is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while VONV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index. VFQY is actively managed, while VONV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFQY returned 8.54%/yr vs 11.19%/yr for VONV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFQY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONV.
Performance
VFQY vs. VONV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFQY achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than VONV's 17.13% return.
VFQY
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 20.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- —
VONV
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 29.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
VFQY vs. VONV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 9.93% | 10.24% | 12.93% | 22.48% | -15.74% | 27.96% | 16.97% | 25.75% | -8.19% |
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 17.13% | 15.81% | 14.28% | 11.40% | -7.65% | 25.28% | 2.71% | 26.48% | -7.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFQY and VONV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between VFQY and VONV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
VFQY vs. VONV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFQY
VONV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VFQY
VONV
Financial Services
VFQY
VONV
Industrials
VFQY
VONV
Consumer Cyclical
VFQY
VONV
Consumer Defensive
VFQY
VONV
Healthcare
VFQY
VONV
Communication Services
VFQY
VONV
Basic Materials
VFQY
VONV
Energy
VFQY
VONV
Real Estate
VFQY
-
VONV
Utilities
VFQY
-
VONV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFQY vs. VONV — Risk / Return Rank
VFQY
VONV
VFQY vs. VONV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFQY | VONV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.48 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 4.41 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.31 | 18.31 | -10.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFQY vs. VONV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFQY drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, roughly equal to the maximum VONV drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFQY and VONV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFQY | VONV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -38.21% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -6.81% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.67% | -15.70% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | -18.87% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -3.89% | -2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 1.64% | +0.81% |
Volatility
VFQY vs. VONV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) is 3.74%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that VFQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFQY | VONV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 4.23% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 8.77% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 11.33% | +2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 14.82% | +3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 17.23% | +3.60% |
VFQY vs. VONV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFQY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VONV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFQY vs. VONV - Dividend Comparison
VFQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than VONV's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.07% | 1.17% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.43% | 0.98% | 1.22% | 1.34% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.60% | 1.82% | 1.97% | 2.10% | 2.22% | 1.67% | 2.25% | 2.30% | 2.56% | 2.18% | 2.39% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFQY and VONV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VONV has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to VFQY (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFQY dropped -37.41% vs VONV's -38.21%.
On 5-year performance, VONV leads with 11.19% vs 8.54% for VFQY. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VFQY has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VONV has performed better with a 11.19% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFQY.
VONV has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.07% for VFQY.
VFQY is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VONV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFQY and 0.06% for VONV.
VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFQY and VONV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer