PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMV vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMV vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.72% return.


VFMV

1D
0.21%
1M
0.96%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.41%
1Y
13.49%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*

VTI

1D
0.47%
1M
4.59%
YTD
11.72%
6M
11.43%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMV vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
8.76%10.52%16.91%8.86%-5.73%20.75%-0.19%27.26%-1.10%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.72%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMV and VTI is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.82

The correlation between VFMV and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFMV vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFMV
VTI

Technology

25.1%
33.5%

Communication Services

10.7%
10.3%

Financial Services

10.6%
12.0%

Industrials

10.1%
9.8%

Healthcare

10.1%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
10.0%

Utilities

6.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

6.4%
2.4%

Energy

3.9%
3.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Technology

VFMV
25.1%
VTI
33.5%

Communication Services

VFMV
10.7%
VTI
10.3%

Financial Services

VFMV
10.6%
VTI
12.0%

Industrials

VFMV
10.1%
VTI
9.8%

Healthcare

VFMV
10.1%
VTI
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

VFMV
9.5%
VTI
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VFMV
6.9%
VTI
10.0%

Utilities

VFMV
6.7%
VTI
2.3%

Real Estate

VFMV
6.4%
VTI
2.4%

Energy

VFMV
3.9%
VTI
3.7%

Basic Materials

VFMV

-

VTI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMV vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMV vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFMVVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.24

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.85

14.94

-6.09

VFMV vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMV and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFMVVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.38

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.74

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.51

+0.19

Drawdowns

VFMV vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMVVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-55.45%

+21.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-8.92%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

-19.30%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-25.36%

+9.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.26%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-8.03%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.93%

-0.40%

Volatility

VFMV vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) is 2.04%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that VFMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMVVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

2.90%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.30%

9.13%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

12.17%

-3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.75%

17.40%

-5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

18.30%

-4.05%

VFMV vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMV vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
1.93%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMV and VTI have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to VFMV (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.80% vs 9.87% for VFMV. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFMV.

VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

VFMV is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMV and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMV and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer