PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMV vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMV vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VFMV having a 9.62% return and SPYM slightly lower at 9.47%.


VFMV

1D
-0.27%
1M
2.40%
6M
6.67%
YTD
9.62%
1Y
13.50%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.94%

SPYM

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.60%
6M
7.91%
YTD
9.47%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
15.03%
ALL TIME*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMV vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
9.62%10.52%16.91%8.86%-5.73%20.75%-0.19%27.26%-0.34%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
9.47%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMV and SPYM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between VFMV and SPYM has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VFMV vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFMV
SPYM

Technology

25.1%
38.5%

Communication Services

10.7%
9.9%

Financial Services

10.6%
11.6%

Industrials

10.1%
8.4%

Healthcare

10.1%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
9.5%

Utilities

6.7%
2.2%

Real Estate

6.4%
1.8%

Energy

3.9%
3.0%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Technology

VFMV
25.1%
SPYM
38.5%

Communication Services

VFMV
10.7%
SPYM
9.9%

Financial Services

VFMV
10.6%
SPYM
11.6%

Industrials

VFMV
10.1%
SPYM
8.4%

Healthcare

VFMV
10.1%
SPYM
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

VFMV
9.5%
SPYM
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VFMV
6.9%
SPYM
9.5%

Utilities

VFMV
6.7%
SPYM
2.2%

Real Estate

VFMV
6.4%
SPYM
1.8%

Energy

VFMV
3.9%
SPYM
3.0%

Basic Materials

VFMV

-

SPYM
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMV vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMV vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFMVSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.22

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.68

9.63

-0.95

VFMV vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMV and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFMV vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMVSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-54.46%

+20.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-8.90%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

-18.72%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-24.48%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-2.01%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-7.12%

+3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

2.05%

-0.49%

Volatility

VFMV vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) is 1.91%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that VFMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMVSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

3.43%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.44%

10.04%

-3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

12.60%

-3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.74%

16.90%

-5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.18%

18.00%

-3.82%

VFMV vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMV vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than SPYM's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
1.77%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMV and SPYM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYM has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to VFMV (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 5-year performance, SPYM leads with 12.89% vs 9.37% for VFMV. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFMV.

VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.04% for SPYM.

VFMV is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMV and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMV and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer