VFMV vs. PGHY
VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) and PGHY (Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while PGHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. VFMV is actively managed, while PGHY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFMV returned 9.52%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for PGHY. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFMV charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PGHY.
Performance
VFMV vs. PGHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly higher than PGHY's 2.18% return.
VFMV
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.72%
- 1Y
- 11.60%
- 3Y*
- 13.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- —
PGHY
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
VFMV vs. PGHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 7.46% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -1.10% |
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 2.18% | 8.88% | 8.39% | 10.15% | -5.50% | 1.22% | 3.04% | 5.87% | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMV and PGHY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.33 |
VFMV vs. PGHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFMV
PGHY
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VFMV
PGHY
Communication Services
VFMV
PGHY
Financial Services
VFMV
PGHY
Industrials
VFMV
PGHY
Healthcare
VFMV
PGHY
Consumer Defensive
VFMV
PGHY
Consumer Cyclical
VFMV
PGHY
Utilities
VFMV
PGHY
Real Estate
VFMV
PGHY
Energy
VFMV
PGHY
Basic Materials
VFMV
-
PGHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMV vs. PGHY — Risk / Return Rank
VFMV
PGHY
VFMV vs. PGHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFMV | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 2.48 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.57 | 9.56 | -1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFMV | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.49 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.83 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.60 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
VFMV vs. PGHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than PGHY's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and PGHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMV | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -20.50% | -13.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.00% | -3.04% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | -5.03% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.41% | -9.42% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -0.80% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -1.64% | -1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 0.79% | +0.74% |
Volatility
VFMV vs. PGHY - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) at 2.00%. This indicates that VFMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMV | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 2.00% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.37% | 3.73% | +2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.83% | 5.06% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 5.45% | +6.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 7.04% | +7.21% |
VFMV vs. PGHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than PGHY's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFMV vs. PGHY - Dividend Comparison
VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than PGHY's 7.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.11% | 7.24% | 7.49% | 7.87% | 5.12% | 5.17% | 5.45% | 5.32% | 5.45% | 5.52% | 6.26% | 4.60% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.95% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMV and PGHY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFMV has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to PGHY (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs PGHY's -20.50%.
On 5-year performance, VFMV leads with 9.52% vs 4.49% for PGHY. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, PGHY has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMV has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PGHY.
PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.11%, compared with 1.95% for VFMV.
VFMV is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while PGHY is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMV and 0.35% for PGHY.
PGHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMV and PGHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer