VFMO vs. FMTM
VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, VFMO returned 43.34% vs 63.62% for FMTM. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.
Performance
VFMO vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMO achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.75% return.
VFMO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- 1Y
- 43.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- —
FMTM
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 34.74%
- 1Y
- 63.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMO vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 23.68% | 24.28% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 31.75% | 27.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMO and FMTM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between VFMO and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMO vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank
VFMO
FMTM
VFMO vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFMO | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 5.28 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.97 | 20.62 | -5.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFMO | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.80 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 2.38 | -1.72 |
Drawdowns
VFMO vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMO drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMO and FMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMO | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.77% | -12.12% | -24.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -12.12% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -1.89% | -5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 3.10% | -0.20% |
Volatility
VFMO vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) have volatilities of 6.20% and 6.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMO | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 6.52% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 17.83% | -1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.20% | 22.82% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 22.94% | -1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 22.94% | +0.63% |
VFMO vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFMO vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison
VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than FMTM's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.63% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMO and FMTM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to VFMO (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMO dropped -36.77% vs FMTM's -12.12%.
On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 43.34% for VFMO. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 43.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FMTM.
VFMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.
Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMO and 0.45% for FMTM.
FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMO and FMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer