PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMO vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMO vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMO achieves a 24.71% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 30.49% return.


VFMO

1D
0.84%
1M
4.64%
YTD
24.71%
6M
22.49%
1Y
44.76%
3Y*
28.43%
5Y*
14.03%
10Y*

VGT

1D
-0.88%
1M
14.99%
YTD
30.49%
6M
28.76%
1Y
58.31%
3Y*
33.33%
5Y*
22.01%
10Y*
25.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMO vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
24.71%17.39%26.14%16.25%-12.84%19.16%31.36%28.22%-11.41%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
30.49%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%-3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMO and VGT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.79

The correlation between VFMO and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFMO vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFMO
VGT

Industrials

24.7%
0.4%

Healthcare

22.9%
0.0%

Technology

17.5%
98.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
0.1%

Energy

7.3%
0.3%

Financial Services

6.5%
0.5%

Basic Materials

6.4%
0.0%

Communication Services

3.4%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%

-

Utilities

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Industrials

VFMO
24.7%
VGT
0.4%

Healthcare

VFMO
22.9%
VGT
0.0%

Technology

VFMO
17.5%
VGT
98.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VFMO
8.7%
VGT
0.1%

Energy

VFMO
7.3%
VGT
0.3%

Financial Services

VFMO
6.5%
VGT
0.5%

Basic Materials

VFMO
6.4%
VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

VFMO
3.4%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

VFMO
2.5%
VGT

-

Utilities

VFMO
0.2%
VGT

-

Real Estate

VFMO
0.1%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMO vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMO
VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMO vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFMOVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

3.57

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.46

11.41

+4.06

VFMO vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMO and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFMOVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.85

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.88

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.68

-0.01

Drawdowns

VFMO vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMO drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMO and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMOVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.77%

-54.63%

+17.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

-16.40%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-27.23%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.80%

-35.07%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.35%

+2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-7.95%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

5.13%

-2.23%

Volatility

VFMO vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) is 6.05%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that VFMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMOVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

6.51%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.38%

16.09%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.21%

20.55%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

25.17%

-3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.56%

24.60%

-1.04%

VFMO vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMO vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.62%0.82%0.72%0.89%1.72%0.81%0.45%1.22%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMO and VGT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to VFMO (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMO dropped -36.77% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 22.01% vs 14.03% for VFMO. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VFMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 22.01% return vs 14.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFMO.

VFMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

VFMO is categorized as Momentum, while VGT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMO and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMO and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer