PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMO vs. VAMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMO vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMO achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly higher than VAMO's 3.15% return.


VFMO

1D
0.11%
1M
5.53%
YTD
23.68%
6M
23.37%
1Y
43.34%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*

VAMO

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
3.15%
6M
4.57%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
5.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMO vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
23.68%17.39%26.14%16.25%-12.84%19.16%31.36%28.22%-11.41%
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
3.15%16.51%6.11%5.58%8.55%32.16%-4.92%-4.63%-11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMO and VAMO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.62

The correlation between VFMO and VAMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFMO vs. VAMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFMO
VAMO

Industrials

24.7%
21.4%

Healthcare

22.9%
17.5%

Technology

17.5%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
33.5%

Energy

7.3%
34.0%

Financial Services

6.5%
38.8%

Basic Materials

6.4%
7.3%

Communication Services

3.4%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
6.5%

Utilities

0.2%
1.6%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Industrials

VFMO
24.7%
VAMO
21.4%

Healthcare

VFMO
22.9%
VAMO
17.5%

Technology

VFMO
17.5%
VAMO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VFMO
8.7%
VAMO
33.5%

Energy

VFMO
7.3%
VAMO
34.0%

Financial Services

VFMO
6.5%
VAMO
38.8%

Basic Materials

VFMO
6.4%
VAMO
7.3%

Communication Services

VFMO
3.4%
VAMO
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

VFMO
2.5%
VAMO
6.5%

Utilities

VFMO
0.2%
VAMO
1.6%

Real Estate

VFMO
0.1%
VAMO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMO vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMO
VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VAMO
VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMO vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFMOVAMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

3.28

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.97

9.47

+5.50

VFMO vs. VAMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the VAMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMO and VAMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFMOVAMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.63

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.47

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.24

+0.41

Drawdowns

VFMO vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMO drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, smaller than the maximum VAMO drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMO and VAMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMOVAMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.77%

-41.84%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

-5.55%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-11.61%

-12.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.80%

-17.25%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.76%

+2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-9.98%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

1.92%

+0.98%

Volatility

VFMO vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) at 2.97%. This indicates that VFMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMOVAMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

2.97%

+3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.37%

7.66%

+8.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.20%

11.19%

+10.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

17.34%

+4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.57%

18.09%

+5.48%

VFMO vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFMO vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison

VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, which matches VAMO's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
0.63%1.41%0.84%1.35%1.10%1.07%1.03%1.15%1.03%0.35%0.56%0.20%
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.63%0.82%0.72%0.89%1.72%0.81%0.45%1.22%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMO and VAMO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFMO has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to VAMO (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMO dropped -36.77% vs VAMO's -41.84%.

On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 13.84% vs 8.12% for VAMO. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.

VFMO and VAMO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.63%.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMO and 0.65% for VAMO.

VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMO and VAMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer