VFMO vs. SMOM
VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
VFMO vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMO achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly higher than SMOM's 9.82% return.
VFMO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- 1Y
- 43.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- —
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMO vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 23.68% | 4.24% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMO and SMOM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMO vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
VFMO
SMOM
VFMO vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFMO | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.97 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFMO | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.45 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
VFMO vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMO drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMO and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMO | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.77% | -7.45% | -29.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -1.48% | -6.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility
VFMO vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMO | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.20% | 12.62% | +8.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 12.62% | +9.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 12.62% | +10.95% |
VFMO vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFMO vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.63% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMO and SMOM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
VFMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
VFMO is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMO and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for VFMO and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer