VFMO vs. MFMO
VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and MFMO (Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFMO.
Performance
VFMO vs. MFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VFMO having a 24.71% return and MFMO slightly higher at 24.93%.
VFMO
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 24.71%
- 6M
- 22.49%
- 1Y
- 44.76%
- 3Y*
- 28.43%
- 5Y*
- 14.03%
- 10Y*
- —
MFMO
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 24.93%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMO vs. MFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 24.71% | -1.74% |
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 24.93% | -1.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMO and MFMO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMO vs. MFMO — Risk / Return Rank
VFMO
MFMO
VFMO vs. MFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFMO | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFMO | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 2.17 | -1.51 |
Drawdowns
VFMO vs. MFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMO drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than MFMO's maximum drawdown of -12.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMO and MFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMO | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.77% | -12.05% | -24.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.44% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -2.41% | -5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility
VFMO vs. MFMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMO | MFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.21% | 24.42% | -3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 24.42% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 24.42% | -0.86% |
VFMO vs. MFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than MFMO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFMO vs. MFMO - Dividend Comparison
VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while MFMO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.62% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VFMO and MFMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFMO.
VFMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for MFMO.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMO and 0.50% for MFMO.
Find the right allocation for VFMO and MFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer