PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMFX vs. ROUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMFX vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares (VFMFX) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMFX achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 16.53% return.


VFMFX

1D
0.25%
1M
2.35%
YTD
14.08%
6M
16.68%
1Y
31.57%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*

ROUS

1D
0.51%
1M
5.76%
YTD
16.53%
6M
17.04%
1Y
30.27%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMFX vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMFX
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares
14.08%14.50%17.21%17.89%-5.78%30.78%3.58%21.81%-14.83%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
16.53%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMFX and ROUS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.91

The correlation between VFMFX and ROUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMFX vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMFX
VFMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMFX vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares (VFMFX) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFMFXROUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

2.67

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.48

3.76

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.47

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

5.12

-0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.10

21.11

-5.00

VFMFX vs. ROUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the ROUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMFX and ROUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFMFXROUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.67

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.91

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.67

-0.12

Drawdowns

VFMFX vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMFX drawdown since its inception was -41.18%, which is greater than ROUS's maximum drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMFX and ROUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMFXROUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.18%

-35.51%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-5.97%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.18%

-15.81%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.18%

-18.91%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

0.00%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-4.24%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.45%

+0.51%

Volatility

VFMFX vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares (VFMFX) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.61%. This indicates that VFMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMFXROUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.61%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

8.54%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

11.37%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

14.38%

+3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.26%

16.96%

+4.30%

VFMFX vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMFX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMFX vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison

VFMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than ROUS's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%
VFMFX
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares
2.75%2.69%3.29%1.66%2.09%1.37%1.48%1.63%1.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMFX and ROUS have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFMFX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to ROUS (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMFX dropped -41.18% vs ROUS's -35.51%.

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMFX and ROUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer