VFMF vs. SCHD
VFMF (Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFMF is a Multi-factor fund actively managed by Vanguard, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. VFMF is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFMF returned 14.79%/yr vs 9.00%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFMF charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
VFMF vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VFMF having a 20.33% return and SCHD slightly higher at 20.66%.
VFMF
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 16.06%
- YTD
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 35.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 14.79%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 16.13%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
VFMF vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF | 20.33% | 17.38% | 15.60% | 18.52% | -5.70% | 30.05% | 4.99% | 22.34% | -10.89% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMF and SCHD is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VFMF and SCHD has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VFMF vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFMF
SCHD
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Financial Services
VFMF
SCHD
Healthcare
VFMF
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
VFMF
SCHD
Technology
VFMF
SCHD
Industrials
VFMF
SCHD
Energy
VFMF
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
VFMF
SCHD
Communication Services
VFMF
SCHD
Basic Materials
VFMF
SCHD
Real Estate
VFMF
SCHD
-
Utilities
VFMF
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMF vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
VFMF
SCHD
VFMF vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFMF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.38 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.98 | 5.12 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.90 | 12.47 | +6.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFMF vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMF drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMF and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.34% | -33.37% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.08% | -4.61% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.57% | -16.13% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.57% | -16.85% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.03% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -3.31% | -2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.89% | -0.03% |
Volatility
VFMF vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) is 2.71%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that VFMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 3.54% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.14% | 7.70% | +1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.06% | 10.93% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 14.36% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 16.70% | +4.35% |
VFMF vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFMF vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
VFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.60% | 1.78% | 2.21% | 1.39% | 1.56% | 1.61% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMF and SCHD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to VFMF (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMF dropped -41.34% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, VFMF leads with 14.79% vs 9.00% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VFMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMF has performed better with a 14.79% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for VFMF.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.36% for VFMF.
VFMF is categorized as Multi-factor, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for VFMF and 0.06% for SCHD.
VFMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMF and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer