PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMF vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMF vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMF achieves a 16.18% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.82% return.


VFMF

1D
1.15%
1M
2.93%
YTD
16.18%
6M
17.39%
1Y
35.69%
3Y*
23.25%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.68%
1M
2.84%
YTD
19.82%
6M
19.65%
1Y
28.76%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMF vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
16.18%17.38%15.60%18.52%-5.70%30.05%4.99%22.34%-11.29%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.82%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.32%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMF and SCHD is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between VFMF and SCHD has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VFMF vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFMF
SCHD

Financial Services

24.6%
9.3%

Healthcare

16.9%
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
6.3%

Technology

12.7%
16.4%

Industrials

9.0%
7.5%

Energy

7.3%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
19.2%

Communication Services

5.0%
6.3%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.3%

-

Utilities

0.2%
0.0%

Financial Services

VFMF
24.6%
SCHD
9.3%

Healthcare

VFMF
16.9%
SCHD
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VFMF
13.6%
SCHD
6.3%

Technology

VFMF
12.7%
SCHD
16.4%

Industrials

VFMF
9.0%
SCHD
7.5%

Energy

VFMF
7.3%
SCHD
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

VFMF
6.8%
SCHD
19.2%

Communication Services

VFMF
5.0%
SCHD
6.3%

Basic Materials

VFMF
3.4%
SCHD
1.2%

Real Estate

VFMF
0.3%
SCHD

-

Utilities

VFMF
0.2%
SCHD
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMF vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMF
VFMF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VFMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMF vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFMFSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.47

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.07

6.26

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.02

15.38

+3.65

VFMF vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMF and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFMFSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.64

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.59

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.86

-0.28

Drawdowns

VFMF vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMF drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMF and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMFSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.34%

-33.37%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-4.61%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-16.13%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.57%

-16.85%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-3.32%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.87%

+0.01%

Volatility

VFMF vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.69%. This indicates that VFMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMFSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

2.69%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

7.65%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

10.95%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

14.38%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

16.71%

+4.44%

VFMF vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMF vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

VFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than SCHD's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.24%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.36%1.54%1.60%1.78%2.21%1.39%1.56%1.61%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMF and SCHD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFMF has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to SCHD (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMF dropped -41.34% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, VFMF leads with 13.18% vs 8.50% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFMF has performed better with a 13.18% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for VFMF.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 1.36% for VFMF.

VFMF is categorized as Multi-factor, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for VFMF and 0.06% for SCHD.

VFMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMF and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer