PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFLO vs. TTAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VFLO vs. TTAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VFLO vs. TTAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
0.38%17.51%21.83%14.59%
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
-0.10%8.07%18.26%10.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than TTAC's -0.10% return.


VFLO

1D
2.23%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
0.38%
6M
5.99%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TTAC

1D
3.03%
1M
-3.07%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VFLO vs. TTAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFLO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TTAC's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VFLO vs. TTAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFLO
VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

TTAC
TTAC Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
TTAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFLO vs. TTAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFLOTTACDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

0.61

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

0.98

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.13

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.01

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.12

4.45

+1.67

VFLO vs. TTAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the TTAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFLO and TTAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFLOTTACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.61

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.69

+0.57

Correlation

The correlation between VFLO and TTAC is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VFLO vs. TTAC - Dividend Comparison

VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than TTAC's 0.63% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
1.42%1.60%1.20%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
0.63%0.62%0.70%0.94%1.36%9.63%0.41%0.72%0.62%0.40%

Drawdowns

VFLO vs. TTAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum TTAC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and TTAC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VFLOTTACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-34.95%

+17.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.49%

-12.12%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-4.31%

+1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-5.07%

+2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.75%

+0.11%

Volatility

VFLO vs. TTAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) is 4.34%, while TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that VFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VFLOTTACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

6.40%

-2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

12.07%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.67%

19.81%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.76%

17.00%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

18.77%

-3.01%