VFLO vs. TTAC
VFLO (Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF) and TTAC (TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFLO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while TTAC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrimTabs. VFLO is passively managed, while TTAC is actively managed. Over the past year, VFLO returned 38.74% vs 20.72% for TTAC. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFLO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TTAC.
Performance
VFLO vs. TTAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 20.09% return, which is significantly higher than TTAC's 17.63% return.
VFLO
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 20.09%
- 6M
- 21.04%
- 1Y
- 38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTAC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 17.63%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- —
VFLO vs. TTAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VFLO Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF | 20.09% | 17.51% | 21.83% | 14.59% |
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 17.63% | 8.07% | 18.26% | 10.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFLO and TTAC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | 0.69 |
The correlation between VFLO and TTAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFLO vs. TTAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFLO
TTAC
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
VFLO
TTAC
Healthcare
VFLO
TTAC
Consumer Cyclical
VFLO
TTAC
Energy
VFLO
TTAC
Communication Services
VFLO
TTAC
Basic Materials
VFLO
TTAC
Industrials
VFLO
TTAC
Utilities
VFLO
TTAC
-
Financial Services
VFLO
TTAC
Consumer Defensive
VFLO
TTAC
Real Estate
VFLO
TTAC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFLO vs. TTAC — Risk / Return Rank
VFLO
TTAC
VFLO vs. TTAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFLO | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.24 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.82 | 2.90 | +4.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.81 | 9.41 | +14.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFLO | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 1.36 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.79 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
VFLO vs. TTAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum TTAC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and TTAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFLO | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -34.95% | +17.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.98% | -7.17% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | 0.00% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -4.99% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 2.21% | -0.58% |
Volatility
VFLO vs. TTAC - Volatility Comparison
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) at 4.48%. This indicates that VFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFLO | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 4.48% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 11.70% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.02% | 15.31% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 17.09% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 18.71% | -2.78% |
VFLO vs. TTAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFLO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TTAC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFLO vs. TTAC - Dividend Comparison
VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than TTAC's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 0.53% | 0.62% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 9.63% | 0.41% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.40% |
VFLO Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.20% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFLO and TTAC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFLO has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to TTAC (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFLO dropped -17.79% vs TTAC's -34.95%.
On 1-year performance, VFLO leads with 38.74% vs 20.72% for TTAC. On fees, VFLO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TTAC has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 38.74% return vs 20.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFLO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TTAC.
VFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.53% for TTAC.
VFLO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TTAC is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Victory and TrimTabs. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VFLO and 0.59% for TTAC.
VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFLO and TTAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer