VFLO vs. DIVB

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

VFLO (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF) and DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFLO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while DIVB is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VFLO returned 24.50%/yr vs 21.77%/yr for DIVB. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFLO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DIVB.

Performance

VFLO vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VFLO having a 22.09% return and DIVB slightly higher at 22.13%.

VFLO

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 3.67%
• 6M: 19.78%
• YTD: 22.09%
• 1Y: 37.81%
• 3Y*: 24.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIVB

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: 3.84%
• 6M: 18.62%
• YTD: 22.13%
• 1Y: 30.52%
• 3Y*: 21.77%
• 5Y*: 13.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFLO vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	22.09%	17.51%	21.83%	15.05%
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF	22.13%	15.09%	18.59%	11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between VFLO and DIVB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.82

The correlation between VFLO and DIVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VFLO vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFLO

VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 91
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

DIVB

DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 90
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFLO vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VFLO	DIVB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.52	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	3.53	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.45	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.90	4.49	+1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.38	15.05	+3.33

VFLO vs. DIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFLO Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the DIVB Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFLO and DIVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VFLO vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and DIVB.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFLO	DIVB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.79%	-36.93%	+19.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.44%	-6.82%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.79%	-15.45%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	0.00%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-4.94%	+2.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	2.03%	+0.03%

Volatility

VFLO vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) is 4.20%, while iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that VFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFLO	DIVB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	4.76%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	9.50%	+2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.56%	12.16%	+3.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.99%	15.35%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.99%	18.35%	-2.36%

VFLO vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFLO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

VFLO vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than DIVB's 2.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF	2.17%	2.50%	2.61%	3.18%	2.02%	1.63%	2.08%	2.07%	2.52%	0.37%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	1.12%	1.60%	1.20%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFLO and DIVB in my portfolio?

VFLO and DIVB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VFLO or DIVB?

DIVB has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to VFLO (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFLO dropped -17.79% vs DIVB's -36.93%.

Which ETF is better, VFLO or DIVB?

On 3-year performance, VFLO leads with 24.50% vs 21.77% for DIVB. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VFLO has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VFLO or DIVB?

Over the 3-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 24.50% return vs 21.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VFLO or DIVB?

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VFLO or DIVB?

DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.12% for VFLO.

What is the main difference between VFLO and DIVB?

VFLO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIVB is Dividend. VFLO tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VFLO and 0.05% for DIVB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.