VFH vs. PBEU
VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) and PBEU (Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - VFH tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index while PBEU tracks the BITA European Banks Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBEU.
Performance
VFH vs. PBEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than PBEU's 13.63% return.
VFH
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- -0.29%
- 6M
- -1.61%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.51%
PBEU
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFH vs. PBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -0.29% | 6.09% |
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 13.63% | 11.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFH and PBEU is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFH vs. PBEU — Risk / Return Rank
VFH
PBEU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFH vs. PBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF (PBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFH | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.58 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFH vs. PBEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than PBEU's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and PBEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFH | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.61% | -17.26% | -61.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -1.42% | -1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.51% | -3.94% | -14.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | — | — |
Volatility
VFH vs. PBEU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFH | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.95% | 27.63% | -12.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 27.63% | -8.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 27.63% | -5.13% |
VFH vs. PBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PBEU's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFH vs. PBEU - Dividend Comparison
VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than PBEU's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFH and PBEU have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for PBEU.
VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.01% for PBEU.
VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while PBEU tracks BITA European Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFH and 0.13% for PBEU.
Find the right allocation for VFH and PBEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer