VFH vs. KWT
VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) and KWT (iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - VFH tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index while KWT tracks the MSCI All Kuwait Select Size Liquidity Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFH returned 11.10%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for KWT. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for KWT.
Performance
VFH vs. KWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly higher than KWT's -3.12% return.
VFH
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.27%
KWT
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- 6M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -3.12%
- 1Y
- -2.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- —
VFH vs. KWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 4.08% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | 18.58% |
KWT iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF | -3.12% | 25.38% | 11.29% | -4.71% | 5.16% | 30.73% | 7.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFH and KWT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.35 |
VFH vs. KWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFH
KWT
Financial Services
Technology
-
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VFH
KWT
Technology
VFH
KWT
-
Real Estate
VFH
KWT
Industrials
VFH
KWT
Healthcare
VFH
KWT
-
Communication Services
VFH
KWT
Consumer Cyclical
VFH
KWT
Basic Materials
VFH
-
KWT
Consumer Defensive
VFH
-
KWT
Energy
VFH
-
KWT
-
Utilities
VFH
-
KWT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFH vs. KWT — Risk / Return Rank
VFH
KWT
VFH vs. KWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF (KWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFH | KWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.98 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | -0.20 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | -0.43 | +2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFH vs. KWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than KWT's maximum drawdown of -24.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and KWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFH | KWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.61% | -24.37% | -54.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -11.54% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.30% | -15.22% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -24.37% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.80% | +7.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.46% | -7.29% | -11.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.69% | 5.27% | +0.42% |
Volatility
VFH vs. KWT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF (KWT) at 3.27%. This indicates that VFH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFH | KWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 3.27% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.51% | 10.27% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 13.38% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.21% | 13.65% | +5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 13.92% | +8.55% |
VFH vs. KWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than KWT's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFH vs. KWT - Dividend Comparison
VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than KWT's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWT iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF | 5.68% | 5.40% | 6.09% | 2.25% | 5.87% | 7.65% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.69% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFH and KWT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFH has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to KWT (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs KWT's -24.37%.
On 5-year performance, VFH leads with 11.10% vs 8.42% for KWT. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, KWT has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFH has performed better with a 11.10% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for KWT.
KWT has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 1.69% for VFH.
VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while KWT tracks MSCI All Kuwait Select Size Liquidity Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFH and 0.74% for KWT.
VFH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFH and KWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer