VFH vs. GABF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. VFH is passively managed, while GABF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VFH returned 21.01%/yr vs 21.50%/yr for GABF. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.

Performance

VFH vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -4.42% return.

VFH

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 4.17%
• YTD: -0.29%
• 6M: -1.61%
• 1Y: 8.93%
• 3Y*: 21.01%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: 13.51%

GABF

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: -4.42%
• 6M: -5.68%
• 1Y: -1.50%
• 3Y*: 21.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFH vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF	-0.29%	14.91%	30.44%	14.17%	2.03%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-4.42%	3.60%	44.38%	38.92%	-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and GABF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022	0.91

The correlation between VFH and GABF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFH vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VFH	GABF
Financial Services	96.8%	85.6%
Technology	2.1%	5.2%
Real Estate	0.8%	4.3%
Industrials	0.2%	4.9%
Healthcare	0.1%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VFH vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFH

VFH Risk / Return Rank: 17
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 17
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 16

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 8
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFH vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VFH	GABF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	-0.09	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	0.00	+0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.00	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	-0.09	+0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.58	-0.20	+1.78

VFH vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and GABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VFH vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and GABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFH	GABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.61%	-20.86%	-57.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.75%	-17.16%	+2.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.30%	-20.86%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.32%	-9.12%	+5.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.51%	-4.90%	-13.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.67%	7.55%	-1.88%

Volatility

VFH vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) have volatilities of 4.19% and 4.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFH	GABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	4.38%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.42%	13.29%	-1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.95%	17.47%	-2.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.26%	20.48%	-1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.50%	20.48%	+2.02%

VFH vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VFH vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than GABF's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	2.05%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF	1.47%	1.55%	1.75%	2.08%	2.31%	1.87%	2.21%	2.17%	2.30%	1.53%	1.63%	2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFH and GABF in my portfolio?

VFH and GABF have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VFH or GABF?

GABF has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to VFH (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs GABF's -20.86%.

Which ETF is better, VFH or GABF?

On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 21.50% vs 21.01% for VFH. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VFH or GABF?

Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 21.50% return vs 21.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VFH or GABF?

VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GABF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VFH or GABF?

GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.47% for VFH.

What is the main difference between VFH and GABF?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFH and 0.10% for GABF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.