PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFFVX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFFVX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFFVX achieves a 12.17% return, which is significantly higher than FFGZX's 4.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VFFVX has outperformed FFGZX with an annualized return of 11.96%, while FFGZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.28% annualized return.


VFFVX

1D
0.37%
1M
5.19%
YTD
12.17%
6M
13.09%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
11.96%

FFGZX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.75%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.42%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFFVX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFFVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund
12.17%21.44%14.50%20.39%-17.48%16.44%16.33%24.98%-7.88%21.39%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.28%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between VFFVX and FFGZX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.73

The correlation between VFFVX and FFGZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (5 years) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFFVX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFFVX
VFFVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VFFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VFFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFFVX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFFVXFFGZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.54

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.18

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.23

14.23

0.00

VFFVX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFFVX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFFVXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.64

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.65

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.97

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.93

-0.17

Drawdowns

VFFVX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFFVX drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFFVX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFFVXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-14.94%

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-3.33%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-4.76%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-14.94%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

-14.94%

-16.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-2.26%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.74%

+1.27%

Volatility

VFFVX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.49%. This indicates that VFFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFFVXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

1.49%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

3.34%

+5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.42%

4.01%

+7.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

5.08%

+9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.10%

4.43%

+10.67%

VFFVX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFFVX and FFGZX have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFFVX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

VFFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than FFGZX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.21%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
VFFVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund
1.85%2.08%2.31%2.18%2.19%10.03%1.82%2.15%2.35%1.83%1.99%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFFVX and FFGZX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFFVX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to FFGZX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFFVX dropped -31.40% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFFVX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer