VFC vs. BKH
VFC (V.F. Corporation) and BKH (Black Hills Corporation) are both stocks. VFC operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while BKH operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, VFC returned -10.23%/yr vs 4.90%/yr for BKH. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
VFC vs. BKH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFC achieves a -19.96% return, which is significantly lower than BKH's 4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, VFC has underperformed BKH with an annualized return of -10.23%, while BKH has yielded a comparatively higher 4.90% annualized return.
VFC
- 1D
- -4.28%
- 1M
- -14.91%
- 6M
- -26.13%
- YTD
- -19.96%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- -7.31%
- 5Y*
- -26.75%
- 10Y*
- -10.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.34%
BKH
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 1Y
- 28.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $45.52M | $54.01M | $68.22M | |
| $167.52M | $128.15M | $135.42M |
VFC vs. BKH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFC V.F. Corporation | -19.96% | -13.83% | 16.64% | -28.51% | -60.38% | -12.05% | -12.00% | 51.70% | -1.33% | 42.78% |
BKH Black Hills Corporation | 4.55% | 23.93% | 13.57% | -19.95% | 3.08% | 18.86% | -19.05% | 28.60% | 7.98% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFC and BKH is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
VFC:
$5.63B
BKH:
$5.42B
VFC:
$0.89
BKH:
$2.08
VFC:
16.01
BKH:
34.24
VFC:
0.29
BKH:
20.43
VFC:
0.44
BKH:
2.33
VFC:
$9.51B
BKH:
$2.29B
VFC:
$4.28B
BKH:
$596.90M
VFC:
$826.88M
BKH:
$554.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFC vs. BKH — Risk / Return Rank
VFC
BKH
VFC vs. BKH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for V.F. Corporation (VFC) and Black Hills Corporation (BKH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFC | BKH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.23 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 2.59 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.85 | 7.72 | -5.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFC vs. BKH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFC drawdown since its inception was -88.41%, which is greater than BKH's maximum drawdown of -65.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFC and BKH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFC | BKH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.41% | -65.72% | -22.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.20% | -10.94% | -22.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.66% | -18.28% | -45.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.34% | -36.98% | -49.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.41% | -40.45% | -47.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.46% | -6.43% | -76.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -16.15% | -5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.49% | 3.67% | +9.82% |
Volatility
VFC vs. BKH - Volatility Comparison
V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a higher volatility of 22.75% compared to Black Hills Corporation (BKH) at 6.15%. This indicates that VFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFC | BKH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.75% | 6.15% | +16.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.49% | 18.00% | +18.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.32% | 22.61% | +28.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.30% | 22.39% | +31.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.42% | 25.59% | +19.83% |
Dividends
VFC vs. BKH - Dividend Comparison
VFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than BKH's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKH Black Hills Corporation | 3.87% | 3.90% | 4.44% | 4.63% | 3.43% | 3.25% | 3.53% | 2.61% | 3.07% | 3.01% | 2.74% | 3.49% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | 2.51% | 1.99% | 1.68% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 2.87% | 2.14% |
Financials
VFC vs. BKH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between V.F. Corporation and Black Hills Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VFC vs. BKH - Profitability Comparison
VFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BKH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Black Hills Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 780.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
VFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, V.F. Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
BKH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Black Hills Corporation reported an operating income of 201.90M and revenue of 780.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.9%.
VFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a net income of -106.89M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of -6.4%.
BKH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Black Hills Corporation reported a net income of -2.10M and revenue of 780.70M, resulting in a net margin of -0.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VFC and BKH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFC has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to BKH (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFC dropped -88.41% vs BKH's -65.72%.
BKH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFC and BKH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer