PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEU vs. EEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEU vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEU achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 27.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEU having a 9.94% annualized return and EEM not far behind at 9.93%.


VEU

1D
-0.98%
1M
5.07%
YTD
14.60%
6M
17.34%
1Y
32.37%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
9.94%

EEM

1D
-1.24%
1M
9.08%
YTD
27.80%
6M
30.51%
1Y
55.80%
3Y*
23.95%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEU vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
14.60%32.35%5.56%15.84%-15.58%8.27%11.10%21.83%-14.18%27.40%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
27.80%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VEU and EEM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2007

0.89

The correlation between VEU and EEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEU vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEU
EEM

Financial Services

23.3%
17.5%

Technology

18.5%
43.6%

Industrials

15.7%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
8.1%

Basic Materials

7.1%
6.1%

Healthcare

7.1%
2.5%

Energy

5.2%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
2.7%

Communication Services

4.6%
5.7%

Utilities

3.2%
2.0%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.9%

Financial Services

VEU
23.3%
EEM
17.5%

Technology

VEU
18.5%
EEM
43.6%

Industrials

VEU
15.7%
EEM
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VEU
8.2%
EEM
8.1%

Basic Materials

VEU
7.1%
EEM
6.1%

Healthcare

VEU
7.1%
EEM
2.5%

Energy

VEU
5.2%
EEM
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

VEU
5.1%
EEM
2.7%

Communication Services

VEU
4.6%
EEM
5.7%

Utilities

VEU
3.2%
EEM
2.0%

Real Estate

VEU
2.0%
EEM
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEU vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEU
VEU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEU vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEUEEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.51

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

4.15

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.06

15.99

-4.93

VEU vs. EEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEU Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEU and EEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEUEEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.81

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.37

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.49

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.38

-0.13

Drawdowns

VEU vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEU drawdown since its inception was -61.52%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEU and EEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEUEEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.52%

-66.43%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-13.52%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-17.29%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-37.71%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-39.82%

+4.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-1.24%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-16.02%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.50%

-0.57%

Volatility

VEU vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) is 5.59%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that VEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEUEEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

8.52%

-2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

17.42%

-4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.29%

19.97%

-4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

18.91%

-2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

20.50%

-3.29%

VEU vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEU has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEU vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

VEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than EEM's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.74%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
2.61%3.09%3.24%3.32%3.12%3.08%2.00%3.10%3.27%2.66%2.96%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEU and EEM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to VEU (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEU dropped -61.52% vs EEM's -66.43%.

On 10-year performance, VEU leads with 9.94% vs 9.93% for EEM. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEU has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.74% for EEM.

VEU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VEU and 0.72% for EEM.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEU and EEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer