VERS vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VERS (ProShares Metaverse ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. VERS is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VERS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

VERS vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

VERS

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 23.22%
• YTD: 36.54%
• 6M: 36.31%
• 1Y: 68.21%
• 3Y*: 31.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VERS vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF	3.33%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VERS and ARMH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

VERS vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VERS

VERS Risk / Return Rank: 67
VERS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
VERS Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
VERS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
VERS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VERS Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VERS vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VERS	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.63	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VERS	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	471,500.14	-471,499.57

Drawdowns

VERS vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VERS drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERS and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	VERS	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.13%	-1.61%	-40.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	0.00%	-0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.06%	-0.40%	-14.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VERS	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.54%	113.00%	-86.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.26%	113.00%	-81.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.26%	113.00%	-81.74%

VERS vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VERS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

VERS vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

VERS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF	0.24%	0.52%	0.58%	0.63%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VERS and ARMH in my portfolio?

VERS and ARMH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VERS or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VERS or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for VERS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VERS or ARMH?

VERS has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between VERS and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VERS and 0.19% for ARMH.