PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VERS vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VERS vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VERS vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VERS
ProShares Metaverse ETF
-13.40%26.16%16.92%51.13%-34.52%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
-20.81%34.35%58.27%198.04%-65.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VERS achieves a -13.40% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -20.81% return.


VERS

1D
5.18%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
-13.40%
6M
-12.36%
1Y
16.46%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
10.00%
1M
-15.69%
YTD
-20.81%
6M
-19.12%
1Y
46.49%
3Y*
45.09%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
34.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VERS vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VERS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VERS vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VERS
VERS Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
VERS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VERS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VERS Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VERS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VERS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VERS vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VERSTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

0.69

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

1.37

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.19

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

1.25

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.05

3.87

-1.81

VERS vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VERS Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VERS and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VERSTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

0.69

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.64

-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between VERS and TQQQ is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VERS vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

VERS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than TQQQ's 0.76% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VERS
ProShares Metaverse ETF
0.38%0.52%0.58%0.63%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.76%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

VERS vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VERS drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERS and TQQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VERSTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.13%

-81.66%

+39.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.02%

-36.97%

+13.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.03%

-30.66%

+11.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.52%

-18.66%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.68%

12.00%

-4.32%

Volatility

VERS vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) is 9.00%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 19.43%. This indicates that VERS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VERSTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

19.43%

-10.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.55%

38.32%

-18.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.58%

67.26%

-37.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.15%

66.55%

-35.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.15%

65.83%

-34.68%