VEA vs. PXF
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - VEA tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index while PXF tracks the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 10.72%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for PXF. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PXF.
Performance
VEA vs. PXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than PXF's 18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed PXF with an annualized return of 10.72%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.26% annualized return.
VEA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
PXF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 39.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
VEA vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.73% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 18.79% | 42.51% | 4.54% | 18.46% | -9.09% | 15.93% | 2.58% | 17.50% | -14.84% | 24.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and PXF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VEA and PXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEA vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
PXF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEA
PXF
Industrials
VEA
PXF
Technology
VEA
PXF
Healthcare
VEA
PXF
Basic Materials
VEA
PXF
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
PXF
Consumer Defensive
VEA
PXF
Energy
VEA
PXF
Communication Services
VEA
PXF
Utilities
VEA
PXF
Real Estate
VEA
PXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
PXF
VEA vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEA | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.45 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 3.66 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 13.76 | -3.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEA vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and PXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -64.74% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -10.91% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -14.06% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -26.82% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -41.59% | +5.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -2.04% | +0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.28% | -15.25% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.90% | +0.12% |
Volatility
VEA vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) have volatilities of 6.84% and 6.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 6.76% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 13.95% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.58% | 16.18% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 16.62% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 18.07% | -0.67% |
VEA vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEA vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than PXF's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.12% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, VEA and PXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to PXF (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs PXF's -64.74%.
On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 12.26% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 12.26% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.
PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.
VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.45% for PXF.
PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and PXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer