PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. NIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. NIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly lower than NIXT's 25.89% return.


VEA

1D
-0.67%
1M
-4.26%
6M
7.02%
YTD
11.59%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
9.92%
ALL TIME*
5.03%

NIXT

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.45%
6M
20.40%
YTD
25.89%
1Y
32.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. NIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
11.59%35.16%-4.40%
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
25.89%4.94%4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and NIXT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.61

The correlation between VEA and NIXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. NIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NIXT
NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. NIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEANIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.75

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

9.32

-0.96

VEA vs. NIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the NIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and NIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. NIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than NIXT's maximum drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and NIXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEANIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-27.75%

-32.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-11.71%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-1.29%

-3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.22%

-5.64%

-7.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.45%

-0.36%

Volatility

VEA vs. NIXT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEANIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

5.19%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.14%

14.63%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.09%

21.09%

-4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

23.02%

-6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

23.02%

-5.84%

VEA vs. NIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than NIXT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. NIXT - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than NIXT's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
1.30%1.64%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and NIXT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to NIXT (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs NIXT's -27.75%.

On 1-year performance, NIXT leads with 32.03% vs 25.76% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, NIXT has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NIXT has performed better with a 32.03% return vs 25.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for NIXT.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.30% for NIXT.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NIXT is Mid Cap Value Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while NIXT tracks Research Affiliates Deletions Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Research Affiliates. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.09% for NIXT.

NIXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and NIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer