VEA vs. MAGS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. VEA is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VEA returned 19.03%/yr vs 31.29%/yr for MAGS. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.

Performance

VEA vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -1.59% return.

VEA

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 14.73%
• 6M: 16.65%
• 1Y: 29.82%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: 10.72%

MAGS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -7.97%
• YTD: -1.59%
• 6M: -0.43%
• 1Y: 23.09%
• 3Y*: 31.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	14.73%	35.16%	3.15%	8.69%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	-1.59%	22.99%	63.97%	35.74%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and MAGS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023	0.52

The correlation between VEA and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEA vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VEA	MAGS
Financial Services	23.3%	-
Industrials	19.2%	-
Technology	13.8%	15.3%
Healthcare	8.2%	-
Basic Materials	7.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	-
Energy	5.4%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	9.1%
Utilities	3.3%	-
Real Estate	2.7%	-

Return for Risk

VEA vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA

VEA Risk / Return Rank: 62
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 63
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 63

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 33
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VEA	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.14	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	1.62	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.20	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	1.25	+1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.92	4.21	+5.71

VEA vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and MAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VEA vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	VEA	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.68%	-29.91%	-30.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.63%	-18.62%	+6.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.45%	-29.91%	+16.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-8.50%	+7.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.28%	-4.72%	-8.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	5.50%	-2.48%

Volatility

VEA vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 5.86%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VEA	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.84%	5.86%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.38%	15.07%	-0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.58%	20.30%	-3.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.72%	25.97%	-9.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.40%	25.97%	-8.57%

VEA vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

VEA vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than MAGS's 1.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.50%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	2.62%	3.22%	3.35%	3.15%	2.91%	3.16%	2.04%	3.04%	3.35%	2.77%	3.05%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VEA and MAGS in my portfolio?

VEA and MAGS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VEA or MAGS?

VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs MAGS's -29.91%.

Which ETF is better, VEA or MAGS?

On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 31.29% vs 19.03% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VEA or MAGS?

Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 31.29% return vs 19.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VEA or MAGS?

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for MAGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VEA or MAGS?

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.50% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between VEA and MAGS?

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.29% for MAGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.